Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Pavement under Dynamic Loading

Authors

  • Hadeel M. Shakir College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Adel A. Al-Azzawi College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Ahmed Farhan Al-Tameemi College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2022.02.06

Abstract

The analysis of rigid pavements is a complex mission for many reasons. First, the loading conditions include the repetition of parts of the applied loads (cyclic loads), which produce fatigue in the pavement materials. Additionally, the climatic conditions reveal an important role in the performance of the pavement since the expansion or contraction induced by temperature differences may significantly change the supporting conditions of the pavement. There is an extra difficulty because the pavement structure is made of completely different materials, such as concrete, steel, and soil, with problems related to their interfaces like contact or friction. Because of the problem's difficulty, the finite element simulation is the best technique incorporated in the analysis of rigid pavements. The ABAQUS software was used to conduct the response of previously tested specimens under different loading conditions. Good agreement between the laboratory and finite element results was observed. The maximum differences between experimental and finite element outcomes in terms of ultimate loads and ultimate deflection for rigid pavements under monotonic loading are 6% and 8%, respectively, and 10% and 18% respectively for the repeated load.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

• ABAQUS, 2012. Theory Manual, User Manual and Example Manual. Version 6.12, Providence, RI.

• ACI Committee 318, 2019, American Concrete Institute, & International Organization for Standardization. 2014. "Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318M-19) and commentary", American Concrete Institute.

• AGENCY, F. E. M., 2007. Interim Testing Protocols for Determining the Seismic Performance Characteristics of Structural and Nonstructural Components. Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, DC

• Belletti, B. and Cerioni, R. Meda, A., and Plizzari, G. A., 2004. Experimental and numerical

• analyses of FRC slabs on grade, In Proceedings of FRAMCOS5 Conference, Vail Colorado: 973-980.

• British Standards Institution, 2004. Eurocode 2 "Design of Concrete Structures: Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings", British Standards Institution

• Daniel, J. I. et al., 2002. Report on Fiber Reinforced Concrete Reported by ACI Committee 544, 96 (Reapproved).

• Ergatoudis, I., Irons, B. M., and Zienkiewicz, O. C., 1968. Curved, isoparametric, quadrilateral elements for finite element analysis, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 4(1), pp. 31–42.

• Khan, M. I., and Harwalkar, A. B., 2014. Mechanistic analysis of rigid pavement for wheel load stresses using Ansys, International Journal of Research in Chemistry and Environment, 4(1): 79–90.

• Kwak, H.-G., and Filippou, F. C., 1990. Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete structures under monotonic loads. Department of Civil Engineering, University of California Berkeley, CA.

• Lundqvist, J., 2007. Numerical Analysis of Concrete Elements Strengthened With Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers. (Doctoral dissertation, Luleå Tekniska Universitet).

• Shakir, H., 2021. Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Pavement under Dynamic Loading. Master's Thesis. Al-Nahrain University.

• Zimmer, J., Klein, D., and Stommel, M., 2015. Experimental And Numerical Analysis Of Liquid-Forming, Key Engineering Materials, 651–653(06): 842–847.

How to Cite

“Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Pavement under Dynamic Loading” (2022) Journal of Engineering, 28(2), pp. 81–98. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2022.02.06.

Publication Dates

Published

2022-02-01