Stiffness Characteristics of Pile Models for Cement Improving Sandy Soil by Low-Pressure Injection Laboratory Setup

Main Article Content

Samir H. Hussein
Mahmod D. Ahmed

Abstract

Soil improvement has developed as a realistic solution for enhancing soil properties so that structures can be constructed to meet project engineering requirements due to the limited availability of construction land in urban centers. The jet grouting method for soil improvement is a novel geotechnical alternative for problematic soils for which conventional foundation designs cannot provide acceptable and lasting solutions. The paper's methodology was based on constructing pile models using a low-pressure injection laboratory setup built and made locally to simulate the operation of field equipment. The setup design was based on previous research that systematically conducted unconfined compression testing (U.C.Ts.). The soil improvement techniques were investigated by injecting a low-pressure mixture of water and ordinary Portland cement (O.P.C.) with (0.8, 1, and 1.3) W/C ratios. The study revealed the relationship between pile model samples (U.C.Ts.) and W/C ratios. It also showed that the pile model samples' (U.C.Ts.) result decreased from 14 to 12 to 10 MPa, respectively, with an increase in W/C ratios from 0.8 to 1 and 1.3, respectively. Furthermore, the stiffness characteristics of a jet grouting column were calculated based on Mohr's Circles theory, and numerous theoretical approaches obtained the consequences of tensile strength.

Article Details

How to Cite
“Stiffness Characteristics of Pile Models for Cement Improving Sandy Soil by Low-Pressure Injection Laboratory Setup” (2023) Journal of Engineering, 29(03), pp. 154–169. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2023.03.11.
Section
Articles

How to Cite

“Stiffness Characteristics of Pile Models for Cement Improving Sandy Soil by Low-Pressure Injection Laboratory Setup” (2023) Journal of Engineering, 29(03), pp. 154–169. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2023.03.11.

Publication Dates

References

ACI committee 318, 2014 Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary, American concrete institute, Farmington Hills, MI, pp.107

Arioglu, N, Girgin, ZC, Arioglu, E, 2006 Evaluation of ratio between splitting tensile strength and compressive strength for concretes up to 120 MPa and its application in strength criterion. ACI Mater. J. 103 (1), 18–24.

ASTM D.2166, (2006) Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil. ASTM standard D. 2166.

Avci E, Mollamahmutoğlu M.2016. UCS properties of superfine cement–grouted sand, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 28(12):06016015.

Bruce MEC, Berg RR, Filz GM, Terashi M, Yang DS, Collin JG, et al., 2013, Federal highway administration design manual: Deep mixing for embankment and foundation support. The United States. Federal Highway Administration. Offices of Research & Development

Carino, NJ, Lew, HS, 1982,Re-examination of the relation between splitting tensile and compressive strength of normal weight concrete”. ACI Mater. J. 79 (3), 214–219.

Celik F, 2019.The observation of permeation grouting method as soil improvement technique with different grout flow models. Geomechanics and Engineering; 17(4):367-74.

CEB-FIB Model Code for Concrete Structures, 1991Evaluation of the Time Dependent Behaviour of Concrete, Bulletin d’Information No. 199, Comite European du Be´ton/Fe´de´ration Internationale de la Precontrainte, Lausanne, pp. 201.

Chu J, Varaksin S, Klotz U, Mengé P, editors. 2009 Construction processes. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (Volumes 1, 2, 3, and 4): IOS Press.

Danot C, Derache N, editors.2007 Grout injection in the laboratory. International Symposium on Earth Reinforcement.

Dano C, Hicher P-Y, Tailliez S., 2004 Engineering properties of grouted sands. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental engineering; 130(3):328-38.

DehqanKhalili H, Ghalandarzadeh A, Moradi M, Karimzadeh R. 2020, Effect of distribution patterns of DSM columns on the efficiency of liquefaction mitigation. Scientia Iranica. 27(5):2198-208.

Kaga M, Yonekura R. 1991 Estimation of strength of silicate grouted sand. Soils and foundations. 31(3):43-59.

Lavanya, G, Jegan, J, 2015 Evaluation of relationship between split tensile strength and compressive strength for geopolymer concrete of varying grades and molarity. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 10 (15), 35523–35527.

Markou I, Droudakis A. 2013Factors affecting engineering properties of microfine cement grouted sands”. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 31(4):1041-58.

Nikbakhtan B. 2015 Development of Thermal-Insulating Soilcrete using Laboratory Jet Grouting Setup. University of Alberta.

Oluokun, FA, Burdette, EG, Deatherage, JH, 1991”Splitting tensile strength and compressive strength relationships at early ages” ACI Mater. J. 88 (2), 115–121.

Schaefer V.R., Mitchell JK, Berg RR, Filz GM, Douglas SC,2012 Ground improvement in the 21st century: a comprehensive web-based information system. Geotechnical Engineering State of the Art and Practice: Keynote Lectures from GeoCongress. p. 272-93.

Sunitsakul J, Sawatparnich A, Sawangsuriya A, 2012 Prediction of unconfined compressive strength of soil–cement at seven days. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 30(1):263-8.

Wang Z, Shen S-L, Ho C-E, Kim Y. 2013” Jet grouting practice: an overview”. Geotechnical Engineering Journal of the SEAGS & AGSSEA. 44(4):88-96.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.