Traffic Congestion Measures and Sustainability Evaluation of Urban Street

Main Article Content

Zainab Ahmed Alkaissi
Ali Nasser Hussein
Murtada Hassan Muhammad

Abstract

Traffic congestion become a serious problem that traffic engineers still face. This research explains the sustainable indicators and congestion index for urban streets and their implementation to evaluate the performance measures proceeding toward sustainable roads. Congestion measures in terms of speed reduction and sustainable indicators; mobility (congestion index, travel time, and delay), costs (vehicle operating cost), socio-economic effect (in terms of an estimated factor called User Satisfaction Index (USI), and air pollution (Fuel emissions) are estimated. Link 3 has the highest delay value of approximately (2 minutes) for the evening peak period in the north-south direction due to a large number of vehicles dense traffic and mixed land use of the study area that produce many attraction trips daily. Congestion is distributed more spatially during the morning peak periods, while in evening periods is relatively concentrated on a specific link. The reduction in travel speed due to the congestion effect induced higher vehicle operating costs of an average unit of 2.9 per Km for links 1, 2.6, and 2.4 for links 2 and 3, respectively, at peak time from (8 a.m. to 12 a.m.). Generally, traffic congestion is mainly concentrated on Links 1 and 3 of Palestine’s urban street segments. The overall user satisfaction index (USI) is 2.209 and about 44.18%, meaning user satisfaction is less than 50%. This illustrates that the selected segment of the study area is unsustainable regarding the social and commuter opinions aspect.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

“Traffic Congestion Measures and Sustainability Evaluation of Urban Street” (2024) Journal of Engineering, 30(06), pp. 19–38. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2024.06.02.

References

AL-Anbari, M. and Alkaissi, Z.A., 2017, Assessment of sustainable indicators for road transportation: a case study of Palestine arterial street. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), pp. 2319-7064. Doi:10.21275/ART20172243

Al–Azawee, E. Th. , 2018, Evaluation of traffic performance of Ahmed Urabi Square in Baghdad city. Journal of Engineering, 24(6), pp. 86–102. Doi:10.31026/j.eng.2018.06.07.

Alkaissi, Z. A. and Yousuf. R. 2020, Delay time analysis and modelling of signalized intersections using global positioning system (GPS) receivers. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, P. 671. Doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/671/1/012110.

Alkaissi, Z.A., 2024, Traffic congestion evaluation of urban streets based on fuzzy inference system and GIS application. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, P. 102725. Doi:10.1016/j.asej.2024.102725.

Alkaissi, Z.A., 2022, Traffic simulation of continuous flow intersection with displaced left-turn: a case study. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 69, P. 39. Doi:10.1186/s44147-022-00091-7.

Alkaissi, Z.A., 2022, Traffic simulation of urban street to estimate capacity. Journal of Engineering, 28 (4), pp. 51-63. Doi:10.31026/j.eng.2022.04.04.

Alkaissi, Z.A., 2023, The effect of one-way urban street on traffic operation performance. International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering and Energetic-Iraq, E3S Web Conf, E3S Web Conf., 427, P. 03018. Doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202342703018.

Balaras, C.A.; Droutsa, K.G.; Dascalaki, E.E.; Kotoyiannidis, S. 2018, Holistic sustainability assessment systems for buildings and neighborhoods. Zb. Međunarodnog Kongr. O KGH, 49, pp. 239–250. Doi:10.24094/kghk.018.49.1.239.

Balaras, C.A.; Droutsa, K.G.; Dascalaki, E.G.; Kontoyiannidis, S.; Moro, A.; Bazzan, E. 2021, A transnational multicriteria assessment method and tool for sustainability rating of the built environment. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/410/1/012068.

Bar-Gera, H., 2007, Evaluation of a cellular phone-based system for measurements of traffic speeds and travel times: A case study from Israel. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 15(6), pp. 380-391. Doi:10.1016/j.trc.2007.06.003.

Berardi, U. 2013, Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 15, pp. 1573–1591.

Carrillo-Rodríguez, J., and Toca, C. E., 2013, Desempeño sostenible en Bogotá: Construcción de un indicador a partir del desempeño local. Eure, 39(117), pp. 165–190. Doi:10.4067/S0250-71612 013000200008.

Elkington, J. 2006. Governance for sustainability. Corp. Gov. An Int. Rev., 14, pp. 522–529. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00527.x.

Faghri, A. and Hamad, K., 2002, Travel time, speed, and delay analysis using an integrated GIS/GPS. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 29(2), pp.325-328. Doi: 10.1139/l02-014.

Falcocchio, J.C. and Levinson, H.S., 2015, Road traffic congestion: a concise guide; Springer: New York, NY, USA. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-15165-6.

Jia, S.Q., P, H.Q., Liu, S., 2011. Urban traffic state estimation considering resident travel characteristics and road network capacity. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 11(5), pp. 81-85. Doi: 10.1016/S1570-6672(10)60142-0.

Jiao, J.; Fu, B. 2021, Quantitative analysis of Melbourne’s land use under mixed development and its insights. Planners, 37, pp. 82–88.

Kang, M.; Yang, G.; Yoo, Y.; Yoo, C., 2020, Proactive congestion avoidance for distributed deep learning. Sensors, 21, P. 174. Doi: 10.3390/s21010174.

Kaur, H.; Garg, P. 2019, Urban sustainability assessment tools: A review. J. Clean. Prod., 210, pp. 146–158. Doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.009.

Law, D.G. 2015, From plimsoll line to triple bottom line: adding value through partnership. Bottom Line, 28, pp. 44–51.

Mathew, T.V., 2014, Fuel consumption and emission studies. Transportation systems engineering. IIT Bombay, Mumbai, pp.1-25.

Mesa García, S. C. 2021, Measurement and evaluation of six urban sustainability criteria (physical aspect), in Bucaramanga, Colombia. Revista Ciudades, Estados y Política, 8(3), pp. 15–36.

Mohammed, K.; Ahmed, N. and Jassim, A., 2006, Improvement of traffic capacity for A-motanabi Square in Kut City. Journal of Engineering, 12(03), pp. 693–710. Doi:10.31026/j.eng.2006.03.20.

Montoya, J., Cartes, I., and Zumelzu, A. 2020, Indicators for evaluating sustainability in Bogota’s informal settlements: Definition and validation. Sustainable Cities and Society. Doi:10.1016/j.scs. 2019.101896.

Nevado-Peña, D.; López-Ruiz, V.R.; Alfaro-Navarro, J.L. 2015, The effects of environmental and social dimensions of sustainability in response to the economic crisis of European cities. Sustainability 7, pp. 8255–8269. Doi:10.3390/su7078255.

Nogueira, E., Sofia G., and João M. 2023, Triple bottom line, sustainability, and economic development: what binds them together bibliometric approach. Sustainability 15 (8), P. 6706. Doi:10.3390/su15086706.

Pires, S.M.; Fidélis, T.; Ramos, T.B. 2014, Measuring and comparing local sustainable development through common indicators: Constraints and achievements in practice. Cities, 39, pp. 1–9.

Quiroga, C. A., 2000, Performance measures and data requirements for congestion management systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 8(1), pp. 287-306. Doi: 10.1016/S0968-090X(00)00008-5.

Rahman, M.M.; Najaf, P.; Fields, M.G.; Thill, J.C., 2022, Traffic congestion and its urban scale factors: Empirical evidence from American urban area. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 16, pp. 406–421. Doi: 10.1080/15568318.2021.1885085.

Rao, A.M. and Rao, K.R., 2012, Measuring urban traffic congestion—A review. Int. J. Traffic Transp. Eng., 2, pp. 286–305. Doi: 10.7708/ijtte.

Robert, R., Theodore, F., 2002, Contrasting the use of time-based and distance-based measures to quantify traffic congestion levels: an analysis of new jersey counties. The 81st Annual Meetings of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. Doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.277.

Schrank, D.; Lomax, T., 2005, Annual urban mobility report; Texas Transportation Institute: Bryan, TX, USA.

Sharifi, A.; Murayama, A. 2013, A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 38, pp. 73–87. Doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.06.006.

Shatnawi, I., Yi, P. and Khliefat, I., 2018, Automated intersection delay estimation using the input–output principle and turning movement data. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 7(2), pp.137-150. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijtst.2018.04.001.

Transportation Research Board, 2000, Highway capacity manual. Washington, D.C.: TRB, National Research Council.

Tu, Y.; Lin, S.k.; Qiao, J.z.; Liu, B., 2021, Deep traffic congestion prediction model based on road segment grouping. Appl. Intell., 51, pp. 8519–8541. Doi: 10.1007/s10489-020-02152-x.

Wangel, J.; Wallhagen, M.; Malmqvist, T.; Finnveden, G. 2016, Certification systems for sustainable neighborhoods: What do they really certify?. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 56, pp. 200–213. Doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2015.10.003.

Yang, Y. 2021, Integrating urban growth and land-use-decision modelling for China’s small-towns. Ph.D. Thesis, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Yang, Y.; Liu, C.; Li, B.; Zhao, J., 2022, Modelling and forecast of future growth for Shandong’s small industrial towns: A scenario-based interactive approach. Sustainability, 14, (24), P. 16823. Doi:10.3390/su142416823.

Yu, Y.; Cui, Y.L.; Zeng, J.Q.; He, C.G.; Wang, D.H., 2022, Identifying traffic clusters in urban networks based on graph theory using license plate recognition data. Physica A, 591, P. 126750. Doi:10.1016/j.physa.2021.126750.

Zhu F.L., 2006, Research on index system of urban traffic congestion measures. Nanjing: Southeast University. Doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.277.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.