Bioremediation of Soil Contaminated with 2,4-D Herbicide Using Bioslurry Reactor

Main Article Content

Yasmen A. Mustafa
Hayder M. Abdul- Hameed
Zainab Abdul Razak

Abstract

Ex-situ bioremediation of 2,4-D herbicide-contaminated soil was studied using a slurry bioreactor operate at aerobic conditions. The performance of the slurry bioreactor was tested for three types of soil (sand, sandy loam and clay) contaminated with different concentration of 2,4-D, 200,300and500mg/kg soil. Sewage sludge was used as an inexpensive source of microorganisms which is available in large quantities in wastewater treatment plants. The results show that all biodegradation experiments demonstrated a significant decreases in 2,4-D concentration in the tested soils. The degradation efficiency in the slurry bioreactor decreases as the initial concentration of 2,4-D in the soils increases.A 100 % removal was achieved at initial concentration of 200mg 2,4-D/kg of sandy soil after 12 days and 92 % at 500mg 2,4-D/kg sandy soil after 14 days.Clay soil represented minimum removal efficiency among the three soils, 82 % at initial concentration of 200mg 2,4-D/kg clay soil after 12 days and 72 % for 500mg 2,4-D/kg clay soil after
14 days. Abiotic conditions were performed to investigate the desorption efficiency of the contaminant from soil to liquid phase through the three soils. In abiotic reactor the results showed that the rate of desorption for sand and sandy loam soils were nearly the same, it varied between0.102-0.135 day-1 at different initial concentration of 2,4-D. While for clay soil the desorption rate varied between 0.042- 0.031 day-1 at different initial concentration of 2,4-D. The decrease in desorption rate in clay soil refers to the characteristic of clay soil, (fine texture, high organic matter and high cation exchange capacity compared with the other soils) that may retain the 2,4-D in the organic matter and the clay minerals.

Article Details

How to Cite
“Bioremediation of Soil Contaminated with 2,4-D Herbicide Using Bioslurry Reactor” (2014) Journal of Engineering, 20(08), pp. 109–128. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2014.08.07.
Section
Articles

How to Cite

“Bioremediation of Soil Contaminated with 2,4-D Herbicide Using Bioslurry Reactor” (2014) Journal of Engineering, 20(08), pp. 109–128. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2014.08.07.

Publication Dates

References

Ali, A. H.,2011, Performance of Adsorption / Biosorption for Removal of Organic and Inorganic Pollutant, PhD thesis, University of Baghdad, Environmental Engineering Department College of Engineering.

Amarante, J. O.P.,Brito,N.M.,Santos,T.C.R.,Nunes,G.S., and Ribeiro,M.L., 2003, Determination of 2,4- Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid and its Major Transformation Product in Soil Samples by Liquid Chromatographic Analysis, Talanta, Vol.60 ,PP.115-121.

Bogacka, E. K., 2011, Surface Properties of Yeast Cells During Heavy Metal Biosorption,Cent. Eur. J. Chem., Vol. , No.2, PP. 348-351.

Boivin, A., Amellal, S., Schiavon, M., and Van Genuchten, M.T., 2005,2,4-Dichlorophenox-yacetic acid (2,4-D) Sorption and Degradation Dynamics in Three Agricultural Soils, Environ. Pollut. , Vol. 138, PP. 92–99.

Bolan, N.S., and Baskaran, S.,1996,Biodegradation of 2,4-D Herbicide as Affected by its adsorption-Desorption Behavior and Microbial Activity of Soils,Aust. J. Soil Res.,Vol. 34 , PP. 1041-1053 .

Clesceri, L.S., Creenberg A.E., and Eaton D. A.,1999, Standard Method for the Examination of Water and Wastewater ,20th edition , 2540G.

Cheney, M., Fiorillo R, Criddle R., 1997, Herbicide and Estrogen Effects on the Metabolic Activity of Elliptio Complanata Measured by Calorespirometry,Comp Biochem Physiol,Vol. 118C, PP. 159–64, 1997.

Cycon´, M., Wo´jcik, M., and Piotrowskaseget, Z.,2011,Biodegradation Kinetics of the Benzimidazole Fungicide Thiophanate-Methyl by Bacteria Isolated from Loamy Sand Soil ,Biodegradation, Vol. 22 , PP. 573–583.

Dejonghe, W., Goris, J., El-Fantroussi, S., Hofte, M., DeVos P., and Verstraete W., 2000, Effect of Dissemination of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D) Degradation Plasmids on 2,4-D Degradation and on Bacterial Community Structure in Two Different Soil Horizons, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. ,Vol. 66, No. 8 , PP. 3297–304.

Dobson, R.S., and Burgess, J.E., 2007,Biological Treatment of Precious Metal Refinery Wastewater,A Review, Miner. Eng. Vol. 20,PP. 519-532.

Fournier, J.C., Codaccioni, P., Soulas, G.,1981, Soil Adaptation to 2,4-D Degradation in Relation to the ApplicationRates and the Metabolic Behavior of the Degrading Microflora, Chemosphere,Vol.10 (8) , PP. 77–84.

Garibay-Orijel, C., Rı´os-Leal, E., Garcı´a-Mena, J., and Poggi-Varaldo, HM. ,2005,2,4,6- Trichlorophenol and Phenol Removal in Methanogenic and Partially-Aerated Methanogenic Conditions in a Fluidized Bed Bioreactor, Chem. Technol. and Biotechnol., Vol. 80, No. 10, PP. 7-1180.

Kwangjick, L., Johnson V. J., Barry, R., and Blakley, B. R.,2001,The Effect of Exposure to a Commercial 2,4-D Formulation During Gestation on the Immune Response in CD Mice, Toxicology,Vol. 165, No. 1, PP. 39-49.

Li, Y. and Li, B.,2011,Study on Fungi-Bacteria Consortium Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Mangrove Sediments Amended with Mixed Biosurfactants,Adv.Mat. Res., Vol. 183-185, PP. 1163-1167.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.