Investigation of Social Concerns Regarding a Sustainable Cement
Main Article Content
Abstract
This work investigates individual and social concerns regarding the integral sustainability of an alternative low-carbon cement. The framework of Integral Philosophy was used for the investigation. Social surveys were conducted in Australian, American, and Sri Lankan contexts. The data was collected through both closed-ended and open-ended questions in a questionnaire. Analysis of responses was carried out using fuzzy techniques and grounded theory techniques. Results indicate that individuals and societies in all three countries are more concerned about market price, quality standards, sustainability issues, and recommendations from professionals when selecting a new cement. In all three contexts, they also indicate that there is generally high support among individuals and societies for accepting low-carbon cement as an integrally sustainable cement. Combining the top-down Integral Theory approach with the bottom-up Grounded Theory is a valuable tool for social science research.
Article Details
How to Cite
Publication Dates
Received
Accepted
Published Online First
References
Afrin, H., Huda, N., and Abbasi, R., 2021. An Overview of Eco-Friendly Alternatives as the Replacement of Cement in Concrete. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1200 (1), P. 012003. Doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1200/1/012003.
Ali, M., and Amir, M., 2016. Pro-environmental products: Marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (OMAN Chapter), 5(6). pp. 1-15 https://www.arabianjbmr.com/pdfs/OM_VOL_5_(6)/R1.pdf
Allan, G.W., 2003. The use of grounded theory as a research method. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, pp. 9-19.
Bediako, M., Adobor, C.D., Amankwah, E.O., Nyako, K., and Kankam, C.K., 2016. Maximizing the sustainability of cement utilization in building projects through the use of greener materials. Journal of Engineering, 2016. Doi:10.1155/2016/1375493.
Brown, B.C., 2005. Theory and practice of integral sustainable development – An overview: Part 1- Qudrants and the practitioner. AQAL Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 1(2), pp. 351-386.
De Kay, M., 2011. Integral Sustainable Design: Transformative Perspectives. London: Earthscan.
De Kay, M., and Guzowski, M., 2006. A model for integral sustainable design explored through daylighting. Proceedings of the 2006 American Solar Energy Society (ASES) Conference, Boulder, Colorado.
Dias, W.P.S., 1999. Soft systems approaches for analysing proposed change and stakeholder response - A case study. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 17(1), pp. 1-17. Doi:10.1080/02630259908970271.
Chandratilake, S.R., and Dias, W.P.S., 2004. Identifying vulnerability to blast loading using grounded theory. Engineering Research Unit Symposium on Research for Industry, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. http://dl.lib.mrt.ac.lk/handle/123/9639.
Esbjorn-Hargens, S., 2009. An overview of integral theory: An all-inclusive framework for the 21st Century. Integral Institute, Resource Paper No. 1, pp. 1-24.
Glaser, B.G., and Strauss, A. L., 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing, Chicago.
Grundey, D., 2008. Experiential marketing vs. traditional marketing: Creating rational and emotional liaisons with consumers. The Romanian Economic Journal, 29(3), pp.133-151.
Haig, B.D., 1995. Grounded theory as scientific method. Philosophy of education, 28(1), pp. 1-11.
Hendriks, C.A, Worrell, E., De Jager, D., Blok, K., and Riemer, P., 1998. Emission reduction of greenhouse gases from the cement industry. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies. Doi:10.1016/B978-008043018-8/50150-8.
Huckle, J., and Martin, A., 2001. Environments in a changing world. Routledge. London.
Karabiyik, H.C., and Elgun, M.N., 2022. A comparative theoretical discussion on the modern and postmodern consumer behaviors. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), pp. 229-242.
Kulasuriya, C., 2015. Alkali Pozzolan Cement for Integral Sustainability. PhD thesis submitted to Curtin University, Perth, 2015.
Kulasuriya, C., Dias, P., and Vimonsatit, V., 2014a. Integral sustainability of Alkali Pozzolan cement. An integral theory application in civil engineering. Journal of Integral Theory & Practice, 9(1), pp. 74-87.
Kulasuriya, C., Vimonsatit, V., Dias, W.P.S., and De Silva, P., 2014b. Design and development of alkali pozzolan cement (APC). Construction and Building Materials, 68, pp. 426-433. Doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.095.
Kulasuriya, C., Dias, W.P.S., and Vimonsatit, V., 2019. Durability properties of Alkali Pozzolan Cement (APC). Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka, 47(1), pp. 121–131. Doi:10.4038/jnsfsr.v47i1.8929.
Kulasuriya, C., Vimonsatit, V., and Dias, W.P.S., 2021. Performance-based energy, ecological and financial costs of a sustainable alternative cement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, P. 125035. Doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125035.
Kulasuriya, C., Dias, W.P.S., Vimonsatit, V., and De Silva, P., 2020. Mechanical and microstructural properties of Alkali Pozzolan Cement (APC). International Journal of Civil Engineering, 18, pp. 1281–1292. Doi:10.1007/s40999-020-00534-3.
Lincoln, Y.S., and Guba, E.G., 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications, Inc., Beverly Hills, Calif.
Mishra, A.K., and Sharestha, B., 2019. Assessment of consumer influencing factor in decision making for selecting cement brands. South Asian Research Journal of Business and Management, 1 (3), pp. 91-105. Doi:10.36346/sarjbm.2019.v01i03.002
Mishra, A.K., 2019. Influential marketing strategies adopted by the cement industries. International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah, 7(10), pp. 155-173. Doi:10.5281/zenodo.3522195.
Ograh, T., Ayarkwa, J., Osei-Asibey, D., Acheampong, A., and Amoah, P., 2021. Drivers of integration of green into supplier selections: a systematic literature review. International Trade, Politics and Development, 5(2), pp. 136-155. Doi:10.1108/ITPD-09-2021-0011.
Pickett-Baker, J., and Ozaki, R., 2008. Pro-environmental products: Marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(5), pp. 281-293. Doi:10.1108/07363760810890516.
Pidgeon, N. F., Turner, B. A., and Blockley, D. I., 1991. The use of grounded theory for conceptual analysis in knowledge elicitation. International Journal of Man-machine Studies, 35(2), pp. 151-173. Doi:10.1016/S0020-7373(05)80146-4.
Schneider, M.,Romer, M., Tschudin, M., and Bolio, H. 2011. Sustainable cement production—present and future. Cement and Concrete Research, 41(7), pp. 642–650. Doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.019.
Syadzwina, M.N., and Astuti, R.D., 2021. Linking green skepticism to green purchase behavior on personal care products in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 716, No. 1, p. 012045). IOP Publishing. Doi:10.1088/1755-1315/716/1/012045
Ur Rahman, S., Chwialkowska, A., Hussain, N., Bhatti, W.A., and Luomala, H., 2023. Cross-cultural perspective on sustainable consumption: Implications for consumer motivations and promotion. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(2), pp. 997-1016. Doi:10.1007/s10668-021-02059-8
Van Oss, H.G., and Padovani, A.C., 2002. Cement manufacture and the environment, Part I: Chemistry and Technology. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 6 (1), pp. 89-106. Doi:10.1162/108819802320971650.
Van Oss, H.G., and Padovani, A.C., 2003. Cement manufacture and the environment Part II: Environmental Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 7 (1), pp. 93-126. Doi:10.1162/108819803766729212.
Yeniyurt, S., and Townsend, J.D., 2003. Does culture explain the acceptance of new products in a country? An empirical investigation. International Marketing Review, 20(4), pp. 377-396. Doi:10.1108/02651330310485153.
Wilber, K., 1995. Sex, ecology, spirituality: The spirit of evolution. Shambhala Publications, Boston.
Wilber, K., 1996. A brief history of everything. Shambhala Publications, Boston.
Zhang, X., and Dong, F., 2020. Why do consumers make green purchase decisions? Insights from a systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(18), No. 6607, pp. 1- 25. Doi:10.3390/ijerph17186607.