SUGGESTED ENERGY EQUIVALENCE APPROACH FOR THE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF TAPERED CHIMNEYS

Main Article Content

Thamir K. Al-Azawi
Dhia, B. Ghailan

Abstract

In this paper an energy equivalence approach is suggested for the dynamic analysis of tapered chimneys. For any mode of vibration; by equating the kinetic energy of the actual chimney 1o that of an equivalent prismatic chimney, a hypothetical equivalent uniform mass has been obtained for the equivalent chimney. Also, by equating the strain energy of the actual and equivalent prismatic chimney, a hypothetical equivalent constant moment of inertia has been derived for the equivalent chimney .The accuracy of the proposed equivalent prismatic model has been checked by comparing the results with that of the conventional segmented model using the stiffness method, which is deemed to be the more rigorous solution. Free and forced dynamic analyses have been carried out and the results indicated that the proposed equivalence energy model is in a good agreement with the stiffness (segmented chimney) model. The maximum discrepancy in the fundamental natural frequency ranges between 1.2% and 144% The difference in the maximum dynamic bending moment due to wind vortex shedding is about 30%

Article Details

How to Cite
“SUGGESTED ENERGY EQUIVALENCE APPROACH FOR THE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF TAPERED CHIMNEYS” (2005) Journal of Engineering, 11(03), pp. 509–521. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2005.03.06.
Section
Articles

How to Cite

“SUGGESTED ENERGY EQUIVALENCE APPROACH FOR THE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF TAPERED CHIMNEYS” (2005) Journal of Engineering, 11(03), pp. 509–521. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2005.03.06.

Publication Dates

References

DIN 1056, Solid Construction. (1969). Free -Standing Chimney. Design and Construction Building Standards Committee

(ACI 307- 1998) Specification for the Design and Construction of Reinforced Concrete Chimneys, American Concrete Institute, 1998

D. B. Ghailan , (1993), Dynamic Assessment of some Reconstructed War - Damaged Chimneys M. Sc. Thesis, University of Baghdad.

.A. Muhammed, (1997), Comparison Between 2D and 3D) Dynamic Analysis of Towers Due to Earthquake Excitation. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Baghdad Paz. M. (1986) MicrocomputerAided Ingineering, Structural Dynamics. VanNostrand Reinhold Cumpany

Pinfold. G. M. (1975), Renforced Concrete Chimneys and Towers. Viewpoints Publications Cement and Conerete Association

Piccardo G. and. Solari (2000). G3D Wind Excited Response of Slender StructuresClased form Solution Journal of Structural Engineering August.

Most read articles by the same author(s)