Statistical Prediction of Soil Atterberg Limits from Grain Size Distribution Alone Using Excel Solver

Main Article Content

Mohammed Yaseen Abdullah

Abstract

Atterberg limits play a crucial role in soil investigations due to their ability to provide fundamental insights into the mechanical behavior of soils. The primary objective of this study was to derive empirical equations for determining the liquid limit (LL) and plastic limit (PL) of soils using only soil particle size distribution data. Microsoft Excel was used for statistical analysis, applying 10 different methodologies. The methodology integrated the clay fraction (CF) (<0.002 mm) as the main independent factor in all models. The only independent variable in model M1 is CF, while model M2 includes sand and silt, in addition to clay fractions, as independent factors. In the analytical process, the number of independent variables progressively increased from model M1 to model M10, systematically enhancing the predictive capacity of the models. Using this methodology, two robust equations were developed in model M6, which are capable of determining LL and PL, with R-squared values reaching the value 1.0 and an RMSE of approximately zero; however, it is important to note that while an RMSE of zero does indicate an R-squared of 1.0, an R-squared of 1.0 does not necessarily imply a zero RMSE.  The results of this study show that full grain size analysis data alone may effectively predict LL and PL, negating the need for additional physical or chemical characteristics of the soil. 

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

“Statistical Prediction of Soil Atterberg Limits from Grain Size Distribution Alone Using Excel Solver” (2025) Journal of Engineering, 31(10), pp. 23–42. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2025.10.02.

References

AASHTO M 145, 2024. Standard Specification for Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures for Highway Construction Purposes. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.: AASHTO.

AASHTO T89, 2022. Standard Method of Test for Determining the Liquid Limit of Soils, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Washington, D.C.: AASHTO.

Abdou Abd El-Naiem, M., 2008. Prediction of the angle of internal friction of sand using the grain-size distribution curve. JES: Journal of Engineering Sciences, 36(3), pp. 569-579. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/jesaun.2008.116135

Abdullah, M.Y., 2024. June. Correlation of grain size distribution with the compaction parameters for fine-grained soils. In AIP Conference Proceedings. 2944(1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0205152

Ahmad, W., and Uchimura, T., 2023. The effect of moisture content at compaction and grain size distribution on the shear strength of unsaturated soils. Sustainability, 15(6), P. 5123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065123

ASTM D2487, 2017. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

ASTM D4318, 2017. Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils, West Conshohocken.PA: ASTM International.

Basson, M.S., 2023. January. Effect of particle size distribution on monotonic shear strength and stress-dilatancy of coarse-grained soils. In Geo-Congress. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484678.031

Borowiec, A. and Wilk, K., 2017. Prediction of consistency parameters of fen soils by neural networks. Computer Assisted Methods in Engineering and Science, 21(1), pp. 67-75.

BS 1377-2, 1990. Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes – Part 2: Classification tests. British Standards Institution (BSI).

Das, B.M., 2013. Principles of geotechnical engineering. 7th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

Deng, Y., Cai, C., Xia, D., Ding, S., Chen, J., and Wang, T., 2017. Soil Atterberg limits of different weathering profiles of the collapsing gullies in the hilly granitic region of southern China. Solid Earth, 8(2), pp. 499-513. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-8-499-2017

Díaz-Curiel, J., Miguel, M.J., Biosca, B. and Arévalo-Lomas, L., 2022. New granulometric expressions for estimating permeability of granular drainages. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 81(10), P. 397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02897-4.

Dolinar, B. and Škrabl, S., 2013. Atterberg limits in relation to other properties of fine-grained soils. Acta Geotechnica Slovenica, 10(2), pp. 4-13.

Duque, J., Fuentes, W., Rey, S. and Molina, E., 2020. Effect of grain size distribution on California bearing ratio (CBR) and modified proctor parameters for granular materials. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45(10), pp. 8231-8239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04673-6

He, J., Liu, F., Deng, G., and Fu, P., 2021. Relationships between gradation and deformation behavior of dense granular materials: Role of high‐order gradation characteristics. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in

Geomechanics, 45(12), pp. 1791-1808. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3224

IS 2720-5, 1985. Methods of test for soils, Part 5: Determination of liquid and plastic limit. Bureau of Indian Standards.

Ishibashi, I. and Hazarika, H., 2015. Soil mechanics fundamentals and applications. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL:CRC Press, P. 9.

Jong, E.D., Acton, D.F., and Stonehouse, H.B., 1990. Estimating the Atterberg limits of southern Saskatchewan soils from texture and carbon contents. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 70(4), pp. 543-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjss90-057

Kayabali, K., 2011. Determination of consistency limits: A comparison between–# 40 and–# 200 materials. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 16(T), pp. 1547-1561.

Khalaf, M.O. and Issa, B.M., 2021. Study of the relationship between some physical properties of selected soils in Babylon, Central Iraq. The Iraqi Geological Journal, pp. 155-164. https://doi.org/10.46717/igj.54.2D.12Ms-2021-10-31

Knadel, M., Rehman, H.U., Pouladi, N., de Jonge, L.W., Moldrup, P., and Arthur, E., 2021. Estimating Atterberg limits of soils from reflectance spectroscopy and pedotransfer functions. Geoderma, 402, P. 115300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115300

Likhith, K.M., Bherde, V., and Balunaini, R.B.U., 2022. Prediction of california bearing ratio (CBR) of soils using AI-based techniques. Indian Geotechnical Conference, IGC 2022, 15th– 17th December 2022, Kochi.

Moradi, S. and Ebrahimi, E., 2013. Relationship between the percentage of clay with liquid limit, plastic limit, and plastic index in four different soil texture classes. TJEAS Journal, 3(8), pp. 697-702.

Nawaz, M.N., Qamar, S.U., Alshameri, B., Karam, S., Çodur, M.K., Nawaz, M.M., Riaz, M.S., and Azab, M., 2022. Study using a machine learning approach for a novel prediction model of liquid limit. Buildings, 12(10), P. 1551. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101551

Nini, R., 2014. Effect of the silt and clay fractions on the liquid limit measurements by Atterberg cup and fall cone penetrometer. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 8(2), pp. 239-241. https://doi.org/10.1179/1939787913Y.0000000018

Polidori E. 2007. Relationship between the Atterberg limits and clay content. Soils and foundations. Oct 1;47(5), pp. 887-96. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.47.887.

Polidori, E., 2003. Proposal for a new plasticity chart. Geotechnique, 53(4), pp. 397-406. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.4.397 .

Rehman, H.U., Knadel, M., Kayabali, K. and Arthur, E., 2019. Estimating Atterberg Limits of Fine‐Grained Soils by Visible–Near‐Infrared Spectroscopy. Vadose Zone Journal, 18(1), P. 190039. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2019.04.0039

Sen, B. and Pal, S.K., 2014. Index properties of soils collected from different locations and correlations of parameters. EJGE, 19, pp. 3443-3452.

Seybold, C.A., Elrashidi, M.A., and Engel, R.J., 2008. Linear regression models to estimate soil liquid limit and plasticity index from basic soil properties. Soil science, 173(1), pp. 25-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ss.0b013e318159a5e1

Sherzoy, M.M., 2017. Atterberg limits prediction comparing SVM with ANFIS model. Journal of Geoscience, Engineering, Environment, and Technology, 2(1), pp. 20-30. https://doi.org/10.24273/jgeet.2017.2.1.16

Smith, G.N., 1986. Probability and statistics in civil engineering. Collins professional and technical books, 244, P. 185.

Stephenson, H.K., Karrh, J.B., and Koplon, N.A., 1967. Compacted soil strength estimated from grain size distribution and soil binder analysis. Highway Record, 190, pp. 1-7.

Sun, Y., Xiao, Y. and Hanif, K.F., 2015. Compressibility dependence on grain size distribution and relative density in sands. Science China Technological Sciences, 58, pp. 443-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11431-015-5768-5

Taskiran, T., 2010. Prediction of California bearing ratio (CBR) of fine-grained soils by AI methods. Advances in Engineering Software, 41(6), pp. 886-892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.01.003

Ubani, C.E., Ani, G.O., and Womiloju, T.T., 2018. Permeability estimation model from grain size Sieve analysis: Data of onshore central Niger Delta. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 3(12), pp. 119-125. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejeng.2018.3.12.503.

Van Hoa, C., Tuan, V.A., Sang, N.T., Lai, N.T., and Tiep, P.D., 2021. Effect of grain size on shear strength of coral gravel sand. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Sustainability in Civil Engineering: ICSCE 2020, 26-27

November, Hanoi, Vietnam, pp. 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0053-1_11

Van Tol, J.J., Dzvene, A.R., Le Roux, P.A.L. and Schall, R., 2016. Pedotransfer functions to predict Atterberg limits for South African soils using measured and morphological properties. Soil Use and Management, 32(4), pp. 635-643. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12303

Yong, L., Chengmin, H., Baoliang, W., Xiafei, T., and Jingjing, L., 2017. A unified expression for grain size distribution of soils. Geoderma, 288, pp. 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.11.011

Zolfaghari, Z., Mosaddeghi, M.R., and Ayoubi, S., 2015. ANN‐based pedotransfer and soil spatial prediction functions for predicting Atterberg consistency limits and indices from easily available properties at the watershed scale in western Iran. Soil Use and Management, 31(1), pp. 142-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12167

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.