A Study of Nuclear Shape Coexistence Near the Fifth Island of Inversion Using the Hartree–Fock plus Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer Method

Main Article Content

Saja H. Mohammed
Ali A. Alzubadi

Abstract

The evolution of shell structure and nuclear deformation in neutron-rich nuclei remains one of the major challenges in nuclear structure physics, particularly near regions associated with shell erosion and shape coexistence. In the present work, neutron-rich isotones with neutron numbers N=50 and N=34 are investigated within the Hartree–Fock (HF) plus Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) framework using the Skyrme SLy5 parameterization. The potential energy surfaces (PES) are calculated as functions of the quadrupole deformation parameter β2 in order to determine the equilibrium nuclear shapes and examine the evolution of shell stability in neutron-rich systems. The calculated results for 70Ca show a nearly spherical minimum at β2 = 0.001 together with a weak oblate configuration, while 72Ti and 74Cr exhibit multiple competing minima corresponding to spherical, oblate, and prolate shapes, indicating pronounced shape coexistence and weakening of the traditional N=50 shell closure. For the N=34 isotones, 54Ca displays weak deformation with β2 = −0.052, supporting enhanced spherical stability, whereas 56Ti and 58Cr exhibit increasing prolate deformation with β2 = 0.101 and β2 = 0.151, respectively, reflecting stronger collective effects and shell evolution. These results indicate that proton-neutron correlations, pairing interactions, and deformation-driving orbitals play a significant role in the evolution of shell structure and the emergence of shape coexistence phenomena in neutron-rich nuclei.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

“A Study of Nuclear Shape Coexistence Near the Fifth Island of Inversion Using the Hartree–Fock plus Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer Method” (2026) Journal of Engineering, 32(7), pp. 210–232. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2026.07.11.

References

Abbas, S.A., Salman, S.H., Ebrahiem, S.A., and Tawfeek, H.M., 2022. Investigation of the nuclear structure of some Ni and Zn isotopes with Skyrme–Hartree–Fock interaction. Baghdad Science Journal, 19(4), pp. 914–921. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2022.19.4.0914

Alzubadi, A.A., and Obaid, R.S., 2019. Study of the nuclear deformation of some even–even isotopes using Hartree–Fock–Bogoliubov method (effect of the collective motion). Indian Journal of Physics, 93(1), pp. 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-018-1269-2

Bender, M., Heenen, P.H., and Reinhard, P.G., 2003. Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75(1), pp. 121–180. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.121

Bender, M., Rutz, K., Reinhard, P.G., and Maruhn, J.A., 2000. Pairing gaps from nuclear mean-field models. Preprint.

Bohr, A., and Mottelson, B.R., 1969. Nuclear structure. Vol. 1: Single-particle motion. Singapore: World Scientific.

Bonatsos, D., Martinou, A., Peroulis, S.K., Mertzimekis, T.J., and Minkov, N., 2023. Shape coexistence in even–even nuclei: A theoretical overview. Atoms, 11(9), P. 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms11090117

Broglia, R.A., and Zelevinsky, V., 2013. Fifty Years of Nuclear BCS Pairing in Finite Systems. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1142/8526

Caurier, E., Martínez-Pinedo, G., Nowacki, F., Poves, A., and Zuker, A.P., 2005. The shell model as a unified view of nuclear structure. Reviews of Modern Physics, 77(2), pp. 427–488. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.77.427

Cejnar, P., Jolie, J., and Casten, R.F., 2010. Quantum phase transitions in nuclear systems. Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(3), pp. 2155–2212.

https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2155

Center for Photonuclear Experiments Data (CDFE), n.d. Center for Photonuclear Experiments Data — Online services.

Chabanat, E., Bonche, P., Haensel, P., Meyer, J., and Schaeffer, R., 1998. A Skyrme parametrization from subnuclear to neutron star densities: Part II. Nuclei far from stabilities. Nuclear Physics A, 635(1–2), pp. 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00180-8

Co, G., Anguiano, M., and Lallena, A.M., 2019. Shell closure at N = 34 and the 48Si nucleus. International Journal of Modern Physics E, 28(09), P. 1950054. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021830131950054X

Co, G., Anguiano, M., and Lallena, A.M., 2021. Mean-field calculations of the ground states of exotic nuclei. Physical Review C, 104(1), p.014313. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.014313

De Donno, V., Co’, G., Anguiano, M., and Lallena, A.M., 2017. Pairing in spherical nuclei: Quasiparticle random-phase approximation calculations with the Gogny interaction. Physical Review C, 95(5), P. 054329. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054329

Do, C.C., Bui, D.L., and Nguyen, D.T., 2024. Evolution of nuclear shell structure in neutron-rich nuclei N = 32 and N = 34. Vietnam Journal of Science and Technology (VMOST), 66(3), pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.31276/VJST.66(3).01-05

Dobaczewski, J., Nazarewicz, W., and Borycki, P., 2007. Mean-field description of ground-state properties of drip-line nuclei: Pairing and continuum effects. Nuclear Physics A, 787, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.53.2809

Ebata, S., and Nakatsukasa, T., 2017. Quadrupole deformation in light nuclei based on the 3D Skyrme Hartree–Fock plus BCS method. Physica Scripta, 92(6), P. 064005.

Erler, J., Klüpfel, P., and Reinhard, P.-G., 2010. Misfits in Skyrme–Hartree–Fock. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, 37(6), P. 064001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/37/6/064001

Fetter, A.L., and Walecka, J.D., 1971. Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Furnstahl, R.J., and Hebeler, K., 2013. New applications of nuclear effective field theory. Reports on Progress in Physics, 76(12), P. 126301. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/76/12/126301

Goriely, S., Chamel, N., and Pearson, J.M., 2009. Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov nuclear mass formulas: Crossing the 0.6 MeV threshold with microscopically deduced pairing. Physical Review Letter, 102, P. 152503

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.152503

Greiner, W., and Maruhn, J.A., 1996. Nuclear Models. 2nd ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60970-1

Hamoudi, A.K., Flaiyh, G.N., and Mohsin, S., 2012. Nucleon momentum distributions and elastic electron scattering form factors for some sd-shell nuclei. Iraqi Journal of Science, 53(4), pp. 819–826.

Heyde, K., and Wood, J.L., 2011. Shape coexistence in atomic nuclei. Reviews of Modern Physics, 83(4), pp. 1467–1521. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1467

Honma, M., Otsuka, T., Mizusaki, T., and Hjorth-Jensen, M., 2009. New effective interaction for pf-shell nuclei. Physical Review C, 80(6), P. 064323. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.80.064323

Iachello, F., Zamfir, N.V., and Casten, R.F., 1998. Phase transitions in nuclear structure. Physical Review Letters, 81(6), pp. 1191–1194. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1191

Meng, J., 1998. Relativistic continuum Hartree–Bogoliubov theory for ground-state properties of exotic nuclei. Nuclear Physics A, 635, pp. 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2005.06.001

Mohammed, R.A., and Majeed, W.Z., 2023. Differences in ground state properties of some mirror nuclei. Physics of Atomic Nuclei, 86(2), pp. 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377882302014X

Mohammed, S.H., Hussein, H.A.J., Jasim, M.G., and Abbas, Z.A., 2026. Theoretical analysis of nuclear radius measurement using nuclear structure models and Figuretechnology-enhanced computational approaches. Experimental and Theoretical Nanotechnology, 10(2), pp. 517–534. https://doi.org/10.56053/10.2.517

Möller, P., Sierk, A.J., Ichikawa, T., Iwamoto, A., Mumpower, M.R., and Myers, W.D., 2016. Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations: FRDM (2012). Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 109–110, pp. 1–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2015.10.002

Nguyen, L.A., Bui, M.L., Papakonstantinou, P., and Auerbach, N., 2024. Shape coexistence and shell evolution in neutron-rich nuclei. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.06117

Reinhard, P.G., Bender, M., Rutz, K., and Maruhn, J.A., 1997. An HFB scheme in natural orbitals. Zeitschrift für Physik A: Hadrons and Nuclei, 358, pp. 277–291.

Reinhard, P.G., and Nazarewicz, W., 2013. Information content of the low-energy electric dipole strength: Correlation analysis. Physical Review C, 87(1), P. 014324. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.014324

Reinhard, P.G., Schuetrumpf, B., and Maruhn, J.A., 2020. The axial Hartree–Fock + BCS code SKYAX. Computer Physics Communications, 258, P. 107603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107603

Ring, P., and Schuck, P., 1980. The Nuclear Many‐Body Problem. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Sorlin, O. and Porquet, M.G., 2008. Nuclear magic numbers: new features far from Stability. Progress in Particle and

Nuclear Physics, 61, pp. 602–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2008.05.001

Stoitsov, M., Dobaczewski, J., Nazarewicz, W., and Ring, P., 2005. Axially deformed solution of the Skyrme–Hartree–Fock–Bogolyubov equations using the transformed harmonic oscillator basis. The program HFBTHO (v1.66p). Computer Physics Communications, 167(1), pp. 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2005.01.001

Sumi, T., Otsuka, T., Suzuki, T., Utsuno, Y., and Tsunoda, N., 2012. Deformation of Ne isotopes in the region of the island of inversion. Physical Review C, 85(6), P. 064613. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.064613

Vautherin, D., and Brink, D.M., 1972. Hartree–Fock calculations with Skyrme’s interaction. Physical Review C, 5(3), pp. 626–647. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.5.626

Warburton, E.K., Becker, J.A., and Brown, B.A., 1990. Mass systematics for A = 29–44 nuclei: The deformed A ∼ 32 region. Physical Review C, 41(3), pp. 1147–1166. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.41.1147

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.