Optimum Reinforcement Depth Ratio for Sandy Soil Enhancement to Support Ring Footing Subjected to a Combination of Inclined-Eccentric Load
Main Article Content
Abstract
This work investigates the impacts of eccentric-inclined load on ring footing performance resting on treated and untreated weak sandy soil, and due to the reduction in the footing carrying capacity due to the combinations of eccentrically-inclined load, the geogrid was used as reinforcement material. Ring radius ratio and reinforcement depth ratio parameters were investigated. Test outcomes showed that the carrying capacity of the footing decreases with the increment in the eccentric-inclined load and footing radius ratio. Furthermore, footing tilt and horizontal displacement increase with increasing the eccentricity and inclination angle, respectively. At the same time, the increment in the horizontal displacement due to the inclined load reduces with increasing the eccentricity ratio.
The results also revealed that the optimum radius ratio under eccentrically-inclined load is n=0.30, the optimum depth ratio is U/B=0.50, and at the optimum depth ratio and with eccentricity ratio of 0.16 and for the inclination angles of 5, 10, 15 the improvement in the carrying capacity was by (115.1%, 126.5%, and 131.5%) for the inclination angles of respectively.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Al-Busoda, B.S., and Hussein, R.S., 2013. Bearing capacity of eccentrically loaded square foundation on compacted reinforced dune sand over gypseous soil. Journal of earth sciences and geotechnical engineering, 3(4), pp. 47-62.
Al-Jeznawi, D., and Al-Azzawi, A.A., 2021. The behavior of strip footing resting on soil strengthened with geogrid. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 17(2), pp. 597-609. Doi:10.2478/cee-2021-0060
Ali, A.M., 2016. Evaluation of bearing capacity of strip foundation subjected to eccentric inclined loads using finite element method. Journal of Engineering, 22(8), pp. 86-102. Doi:10.31026/j.eng.2016.08.06.
Al-Mhaidib, A.I., 1999. Bearing capacity of a model pile in sand under different loading rates. The Ninth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference.
Al-Mosawe, M.J., Al-Saidi, A.A., and Jawad., F.W., 2010. Bearing capacity of square footing on geogrid-reinforced loose sand to resist eccentric load. Journal of Engineering, 16(2), pp. 4990-4999.
Al-Mosawe, M.J., Al-Saidi, A.A., and Jawad, F.W., 2008. Improvement of soil using geogrids to resist eccentric loads. Journal of Engineering, 4(14), pp. 3198-3208.
AL-Saidi, A.A., 2009. Evaluation the behavior of reinforced loose sand under inclined loading. Journal of Karbala University, 7(3), pp. 98-108.
Al-Sumaiday, H.G.R., and Al-Tikrity, I.S.H., 2013. Experimental investigation of the bearing pressure for circular and ring footings on sand. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences, 20(3), pp. 64-74. Doi:10.25130/tjes.20.3.07
Al-Tirkity, J.K., and Al-Taay, A.H., 2012. Bearing capacity of eccentrically loaded strip footing on geogrid reinforced sand. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences, 19(1), pp. 14-22. Doi:10.25130/tjes.19.1.02
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2006): Standard test method for classification of soil for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), ASTM D2487-06, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM), 1969. Standard Test Method for Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils, ASTM D 2049-69 International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2006. Standard Test Method for Particle Size-Analysis of Soils, ASTM D422-63 (2002), West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2006. Standard Test Method for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer, ASTM D854, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.
Bachay H.A., and Al-Saidi A.A., 2022. The optimum reinforcement layer number for soil under the ring footing subjected to inclined load. Journal of Engineering, 28(12), PP. 18-33. Doi:10.31026/j.eng.2022.12.02
Boushehrian, J.H., and Hataf, N., 2003. Experimental and numerical investigation of the bearing capacity of model circular and ring footings on reinforced sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 21(4), pp. 241-256. Doi:10.1016/S0266-1144(03)00029-3
Boushehrian, A. H., and Hataf, N., 2009. Bearing capacity of ring footings on reinforced clay. In Geosynthetics in Civil and Environmental Engineering: Geosynthetics Asia 2008 Proceedings of the 4th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics in Shanghai, China, pp. 328-331.
Cicek, E., Guler, E., and Yetimoglu, T., 2012. Effect of reinforcement type and number on the load-settlement behavior of strip footings. 3rd International Conference on New Developments in Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Das, S.K., and Samadhiya, N.K., 2020. A numerical parametric study on the efficiency of prestressed geogrid reinforced soil. In E3S Web of Conferences, 205, P. 12004. Doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202020512004
El-Sawwaf, M., and Nazir, A., 2012. Behavior of eccentrically loaded small-scale ring footings resting on reinforced layered soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 138(2), pp. 376-384. Doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000593
Fakher, N.A., and Fakhruldin, M.K., 2021. Influence of the number of reinforcement layers on the bearing capacity of strip foundation resting on sandy soil, Al-Qadisiya Journal for Engineering Science, 13, pp. 300-305. Doi:10.30772/qjes.v13i4.689
Fazel, S.A.H., and Bazaz, B., 2020. Behavior of eccentrically inclined loaded ring footings resting on granular soil. International Journal of Engineering, 33(11), pp. 2146-54. Doi:10.5829/IJE.2020.33.11B.04
Gupta, S., and Mital, A., 2021. Behaviour of eccentrically inclined loaded rectangular foundation on reinforced sand. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 43(2), pp. 74-89. Doi:10.2478/sgem-2021-0003
Jawad, Z.H., and Shakir, R.R., 2021. Behavior of foundation rested on geogrid-reinforced soil: a review. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1094, No. 1, p. 012110). IOP Publishing. Doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1094/1/012110
Kadhum, M.Q., and Al-Busoda, B.S., 2021. Behaviors of ring and circular footings subjected to eccentric loading: a comparative study. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1067(1), P. 012056. Doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1067/1/012056
Kolay, P.K., Kumar, S., and Tiwari, D., 2013. Improvement of bearing capacity of shallow foundation on geogrid reinforced silty clay and sand. Journal of Construction Engineering, 2013, pp. 1-10. Doi:10.1155/2013/293809
Patel, P., and Bhoi, M., 2019. Study of Bearing Capacity and Settlement Behaviour of Solid Circular and Hollow Circular Footings on Granular Soil. Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering (CSEE’19) Rome, Italy – April, Pap. No. ICGRE 163. Doi:10.11159/icgre19.163
Raheem, A.M., and Abdulkarem, M.A., 2016. Experimental testing and analytical modeling of strip footing in reinforced sandy soil with multi-geogrid layers under different loading conditions. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 4(1), pp. 1-11. Doi:10.11648/j.ajce.20160401.11
Sharma, V., and Kumar, A., 2018. Behavior of ring footing resting on reinforced sand subjected to eccentric-inclined loading. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 10(2), pp. 347-357. Doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.11.005
Shukla, S., Sivakugan, N., and Das, B., 2009. Fundamental concepts of soil reinforcement—an overview. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 3(3), pp. 329-342. Doi:10.3328/IJGE.2009.03.03.329-342
Snodi, L.N., 2010. Ultimate bearing capacity of ring footings on sand. Wasit Journal for Science and Medicine, 1, P. 7180.
Yadu, L., and Tripathi, R., 2013. Effect of the length of geogrid layers in the bearing capacity ratio of geogrid reinforced granular fill-soft subgrade soil system. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 104, pp. 225-234. Doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.115
Xu, C., Liang, C., Shen, P., and Chai, F., 2020. Experimental and numerical studies on the reinforcing mechanisms of geosynthetic-reinforced granular soil under a plane strain condition. Soils and Foundations, 60(2), pp. 466-477. Doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2020.03.003