Damage Detection and Assessment of Stiffness and Mass Matrices in Curved Simply Supported Beam Using Genetic Algorithm
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this study, a genetic algorithm (GA) is used to detect damage in curved beam model, stiffness as well as mass matrices of the curved beam elements is formulated using Hamilton's principle. Each node of the curved beam element possesses seven degrees of freedom including the warping degree of freedom. The curved beam element had been derived based on the Kang and Yoo’s thin-walled curved beam theory. The identification of damage is formulated as an optimization problem, binary and continuous genetic algorithms
(BGA, CGA) are used to detect and locate the damage using two objective functions (change in natural frequencies, Modal Assurance Criterion MAC). The results show the objective function based on change in natural frequency is the best objective and no error was recorded in prediction of location and small error in detecting damage value. Also the result show that the genetic algorithm method are efficient indicating and quantifying single and multiple damage with high precision, and the prediction error for the CGA are less than corresponding value for the BGA.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Andrew Chipperfield, Peter Fleming, Hartmut Pohlheim and Carlos Fonscca, “Genetic algorithm Toolbox for use with Matlab” User’s Guide, Version 1.2
D. E. Goldberg, "Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning", Addison-Wesley, 1989.
E. S. Sazonov, P. Klinkhachorn and U. B. Halabe (2002). “ Genetic algorithms-based parameter optimization of non-destructive damage detection method”. IEEE Trans
H. M. Gomes and N. R. S. Silva (2007). “Some comparisons for damage detection on structures using genetic algorithms and modal sensitivity method”. Journal of Applied Mathematical Modeling.
H. Y. Guo and Z. L. Li (2008). “ A two-stage method to identify structural damage sites and micro-search genetic algorithm”. Journal homepage: ww.elsevier.com / locate/ jnlabr/ymssp
H. Pohlheim, “Evolutionary algorithm: Overview, Methods and Operators”. Version 3.7,November, 2007. Available At www.Geatbx.Com/
J. H. Chou and J. Ghaboussi (2001). “ Genetic algorithm in structural damage detection”.Journal of Computers and Structures”. Vol. 79, Pages 1335-1353.
Ki-Young Yoon, Nam Hoi Park, Young Joon Choi, and Young-Jong Kang (2006). “Natural frequency of thin-walled curved beams” Journal of Finite Element in Analysis and Design. Vol. 42, Pages 1176 – 1186.
Ki-Young Yoona, Young-Jong Kangb, YoungJoon Choic, and Nam-Hoi Parkb. "Free vibration analysis of horizontally curved steel I-girder bridges". Journal of Thin-Walled Structures. Vol. 43, Pages 679–699(2005). M. Obitko, Genetic Algorithm, available at http://cs.felk.cvut.cz/~xobitko/go/main.Html,1998.
M. I. Friswell, J. E. T. Penny, S. D. Garvey (1998). “A combined genetic and eigensensitivity algorithm for the location of damage in structures”. Journal of Computers and Structures. Vol. 69, Pages 547-556.
C. Mares, C. Surace (1996). “ An application of genetic algorithms to identify damage in elastic structures” Journal of Sound and Vibration. Vol. 195, No. 2, Pages 195-215.
M. T. V. Baghmisheh, M. Peimani, M. H. Sadeghi, M. M. Ettefagh (2008). “Crack detection in beam-like structures using genetic algorithms” Journal of Applied Soft Computing. Vol. 8, Pages 1150-1160.
L. Randy ,S. Ellen Haupt (2004). “ Practical genetic algorithms”, Jone Wiley and Sons Publishers, Second edition (book).
R. Song He and S. F. Hwang (2006). “ Damage detection by an adaptive real-parameter simulated annealing genetic algorithm” Journal Computers and Structures. Vol. 84, Pages 2231-2243.
W. M. Ostachowicz, M. Krawczuk and M. P. Cartmell (1996). “Genetic algorithms in health monitoring of structures”, University of Glasgow, Department of Mechanical Engineering, James Watt Bulding, Glasgow, Scotland, Internal Report.