Reduction of Concentrating Poisonous Metallic Radicals from Industrial Wastewater by Forward and Reverse Osmosis

Main Article Content

G. A. R. Rassoul
Ahmed Faiq Al – Alawy
Woodyian Nahedth Khudair

Abstract

The research aims to use a new technology for industrial water concentrating that contains poisonous metals and recovery quantities from pure water. Therefore, the technology investigated is the forward osmosis process (FO). It is a new process that use membranes available commercial and this process distinguishes by its low cost compared to other process. Sodium chloride (NaCl) was used as draw solution to extract water from poisonous metals solution. The driving force in the FO process is provided by a different in osmotic pressure (concentration) across the membrane between the draw and poisonous metals solution sides. Experimental work was divided into three parts. The first part includes operating the forward osmosis process using TFC membrane as flat sheet for NaCl. The operating parameters studied were: draw solutions concentration (10 – 95 g/l), draw solution flow rate (12-36 I/h), temperature of draw solution (30 and 40°C), feed solution concentration (10 -210 mg/l), feed solution flow rate (10 -50 l/h), temperature of feed solution (30 and 40°C) and Pressure (0.4 bar). The second part includes operating the forward osmosis process using CTA membrane as flat sheet for NaCl. The operating parameters studied were: draw solution concentration (15 – 95 g/l), feed solution concentration (10-210 mg/l). Constant temperature was maintained at 30°C. The last part includes operating the reverse osmosis process using TFC membrane as spiral wound module in order to separate NaCl salt from draw solution and obtain on pure water so as to usefully in
different uses and also obtain on solution of NaCl concentrate which was recirculated to forward osmosis process. It is then used as draw solution. The operating parameter studied was: feed solution flow rate (15-55 l/h). The experimental results show that the water flux increases with increasing draw solution concentration, feed solution flow rate, temperature of draw solution and decreases with increasing feed solution concentration, draw solution flow rate and temperature of feed solution. The experiments also show that CTA membrane gives higher water flux than TFC membrane for forward osmosis operation.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

“Reduction of Concentrating Poisonous Metallic Radicals from Industrial Wastewater by Forward and Reverse Osmosis ” (2012) Journal of Engineering, 18(07), pp. 784–798. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2012.07.02.

References

• Achanai , B., Nattawut , C., Kittiya, P., and Lalita., N., 2008. "Use of Natural Clinoptilolite for the Removal of Lead from Waste Water". Chiang Mai J. SCi. 35(3). P. 447-456.

• Gordon, T.G., Jeffrey, R., and Menachem, E., 2006. "Internal Concentration Polarization in Forward Osmosis: Role of Membrane Orientation". Desalination. 197, P. 1-8.

• Gray, G.T., Mccutcheon, J.R., Elimelech, M., 2006. "Internal Concentration Polarization in Forward Osmosis: Role of Membrane Orientation". Desalination. 197, P. 1-8.

• Howy, N.G., Wanling, T., and Weis. W., 2006. "Performance of Forward OsmosisProcess". Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, P. 2408 – 2413 .

• Jacks, G., Bhatta Charya , P., and Chatterjee , D., 2001. "Artificial Recharge as a Remedial Measure for in Situ Removal of Arsenic from the Groundwater". P. 71-75.

• Jeffery, R., and Menachem, E., 2007. "Modeling water Flux in Forward Osmosis". Alche. j. 53, P. 1736.

• Lee, K.L., Waker, R.W., and Lonsdale, H.K., 1981. "Membranes for Power Generation by Pressure – Retarded Osmosis". J. Membr. Sci. 8 , P. 141 -171.

• Loeb, S., Titelman, L., Korngold, E., and Freiman, J., 1997. "Effect of Porous Support Fabric on Osmosis through a Loeb – Sourirajan Type Asymmetric Membrane". J. Membr. Sci. 129, P. 243 – 249.

• Mccutcheon , J. R., and McGinnis , R. L., 2006." Desalination by A novel Ammonia – Carbon Dioxide Forward Osmosis Process: Influence of Draw and Feed Solution Concentration on Process Performance". J. Membr. Sc. 278, P. 114-123.

• Mccutcheon , J.R., Elimelech, M., 2006." Influence of Concentrative and Dilutive Internal Concentration Polarization on Flux Behavior in Forward Osmosis". J. Membr. Sci. 284, P. 237-247.

• Mccutcheon, J.R., McGinnis, R.L., and Elimelech, M., 2006. "Desalination by Anovel Ammonia – Carbon Dioxide Forward Osmosis Process: Influence of Draw and Feed Solution Concentration on Process Performance". J. Membr. Sci. 278, P. 114 – 123.

• Mehta, G.D., and Loeb, S., 1978. "Internal Polarization in the Porous Substructure of a Semi – Permeable Membrane under Pressure – Retarded Osmosis". J. Membr. Sci. 4, P. 261.

• Mesa, A.A., Gomezand, G.M., and Azpitaite R.U., 1997. "Energy Saving and Desalination of Water". Desalination. 108, P. 43-50.

• Mustafa, H., 2009. "A study of Forward Osmosis Using Various Drawing Agents". M.SC. Thesis, Baghdad University.

• Seppala , A., Lampinen, M.J., 2004. "On the Non- Linearity of Osmotic Flow", Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 28, P. 283 – 296.

• Tzahi, Y.C., Amy, E.C., and Menachem, E., 2006. "Forward Osmosis: Principles, Applications, and Recent Developments". Journal of Membrane Science. 281, P.70-87.

• Young, J. C., June, S. C., and Joon, H.K., 2009."Toward a Combined System of Forward Osmosis and Reverse Osmosis for Sea water". Desalination. 249, P. 239-246.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.