Evaluating Proactive Social Responsibility and the Potential for Responsible User Behaviour in Riverfront Development: Abu-Nuwas Street, Baghdad as a Case Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Riverfronts are significant public spaces, promoting belonging, social interaction and collective use. This study seeks to evaluate how proactive social responsibility is reflected in riverfront planning and assess how spatial quality indicators may provide conditions that support responsible user behavior, focusing on Abu-Nuwas Street in Baghdad as a case study. PSR is considered a planning and administrative framework embedded in design decisions, while responsible user behavior is a potential outcome. The study adopted a quantitative descriptive-analytical approach through two five-point Likert scale questionnaires. The first surveyed users and visitors of the recreational riverfront area (n=143), while the second surveyed architects and built-environment specialists regarding the road expansion project (n=47). Data were analyzed using means and standard deviations. Users reported high levels of place identity and attachment, safety and comfort, social interaction, and aesthetic and visual quality, in contrast accessibility, walkability, and environmental quality received moderate evaluations. Specialists reported moderate performance across PSR indicators, with stronger spatial connectivity but weaker place identity, pedestrian priority, environmental impact, and long-term social sustainability. The findings indicate that the recreational riverfront provides spatial conditions that may support positive collective use and place attachment, whereas the road expansion project prioritizes traffic-functional performance over social-environmental objectives. The study develops a descriptive-analytical framework for evaluating how proactive planning and riverfront environmental quality may foster conditions supporting socially responsible user behavior.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Ahmed, B. and Khalfallah, B., 2026. The role of synergy index on the people interaction inside the city of djelfa by using space syntax technique. Iraqi Journal of Architecture and Planning, 25(1), pp. 122–136. https://doi.org/10.36041/iqjap.2025.161332.1176.
Ali, N.H., Al-Kindy, S.K., and Nasar, Z.A., 2026. The reading Baghdad’s riverfront spaces: A space syntax approach to uncovering the urban event potential between Rusafa and Karkh. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 25(1), pp. 19–33. https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.11646.
Aravena, A., and Iacobelli, A., 2016. Elemental: Incremental Housing and Participatory Design Manual. Berlin: Hatje Cantz.
Avni, N., and Teschner, N., 2019. Urban waterfronts: Contemporary streams of planning conflicts. Journal of Planning Literature, 34(4), pp. 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412219850891.
Awwal, S., and Borsi, K., 2020. Assessing the social impact of the public realm in waterfront regeneration. Civil Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.17501/26731029.2020.1102.
Bell, B., and Wakeford, K., 2008. Expanding Architecture: Design as Activism. New York: Metropolis Books.
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., and Tiesdell, S., 2021. Public Places Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
Carroll, A.B., 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), pp. 39–48.
Carroll, A.B., and Shabana, K.M., 2010. The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), pp. 85–105.
Cervero, R., Kang, C.D., and Shively, K., 2009. From elevated freeways to surface boulevards: neighborhood and housing price impacts in san francisco. Journal of Urbanism, 2(1), pp. 31–50.
Cipolla, C., and Bartholo, R., 2014. Empathy or inclusion: A dialogical approach to socially responsible design. International Journal of Design, 8(2), pp. 87–100.
Corsini, L., and Moultrie, J., 2021. What is design for social sustainability? a systematic literature review for designers of product-service systems. Sustainability, 13(11), 5963. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115963.
Gehl, J., 2011. Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. 6th ed. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Hoyle, B., 2000. Global and local change on the port-city waterfront. Geographical Review, 90(3), pp. 395–417.
Jacobs, J., 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
Kumar, R., 2011. Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Lewicka, M., 2011. Place attachment: how far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), pp. 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001.
Marshall, R., 2001. Waterfronts in Post-Industrial Cities. London: Spon Press.
Melles, G., de Vere, I., and Misic, V., 2011. Socially responsible design: Thinking beyond the triple bottom line to socially responsive and sustainable product design. CoDesign, 7(3–4), pp. 143–154.
Pinto, P.J., and Kondolf, G.M., 2020. The Fit of urban waterfront interventions: matters of size, money and function. Sustainability, 12(10), P. 4079. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104079.
Porter, M.E., and Kramer, M.R., 2006. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), pp. 78–92.
Qi, J., Mazumdar, S., and Vasconcelos, A.C., 2024. Understanding the relationship between urban public space and social cohesion: a systematic review. International Journal of Community Well-Being. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-024-00204-5.
Republic of Iraq, 1987. Law on the Exploitation of Shores No. 59 of 1987. Iraqi Official Gazette.
Republic of Iraq, 1990. Law No. 7 of 1990 Amending the Law on the Exploitation of Shores No. 59 of 1987. Iraqi Official Gazette.
Shao, Z., Tang, Y. and Zhang, J., 2026. Users’ perceptions of public space quality in urban waterfront regeneration: A case study of the south bank of the Qiantang River in Hangzhou, China. Land, 15(1), P. 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15010125.
Shin, H.D., and Bull, R., 2019. Three dimensions of design for sustainable behaviour. Sustainability, 11(17), 4610. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174610.
Smith, H., and García Ferrari, M.S., 2012. Waterfront Regeneration: Experiences in City-Building. London: Routledge.
Taha, Y.M.R., 2014. Consolidating socio-spatial practices in a militarized public space: the case of Abu Nuwas Street in Baghdad. Master’s thesis, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Tromp, N., Hekkert, P., and Verbeek, P.P., 2011. Design for socially responsible behavior: A classification of influence based on intended experience. Design Issues, 27(3), pp. 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00087.
Whyte, W.H., 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. New York: Project for Public Spaces.
Windsor, D., 2006. Corporate social responsibility: three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), pp. 93–114.
Wrenn, D.M., 1983. Urban Waterfront Development. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
Zedan, S.K., and Al-Moqaram, A.M.H., 2026. The role of city brand equity effectiveness in Baghdad’s branding. Iraqi Journal of Architecture and Planning, 25(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.36041/iqjap.2025.152880.1108.