A Comprehensive Review of the Pipe Sticking Mechanism in Oil Well Drilling Operations

Main Article Content

Ahmed Taqi Kahdim Mahmood
Amel Habeeb Assi

Abstract

As stuck pipe holds on to be a prime contributor to non-productive time (NPT) in drilling industry operations, efforts to restrict its incidence cannot be over-emphasized. Historically, stuck-pipe events have been shown to cost the industry several hundred million dollars annually and over 25% of non-productive time. British Petroleum Company's stuck pipe costs exceed $30 million annually. Industry-stuck pipe costs are estimated to be above $250 million annually. Major causes of this issue involve wellbore instability, differential sticking forces, improper hole cleaning, and the forming of drill-cutting beds, especially in high-angle wells. One strategy for avoiding stuck pipe issues is to predict by using the available drilling data, which can be utilized to adjust drilling parameters. Preventing stuck pipes requires close monitoring of early warning signs, such as increases in torque and drag, excessive cuttings loading, tight spots while tripping, and loss of circulation while drilling. A machine learning (ML) approach was employed to identify warning signals and anticipate stuck pipe events due to its ability to handle complex parameter relationships. This article proposes an extensive comprehensive review of challenges associated with pipe-sticking issues to detect warning signs and early indicators of a stuck pipe during drilling to prevent it and provide operational recommendations for avoiding or freeing stuck pipes. Finally, this research paper analyzes and consolidates the idea of the importance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods for predicting the condition of stuck pipes during well drilling.

Article Details

How to Cite
“A Comprehensive Review of the Pipe Sticking Mechanism in Oil Well Drilling Operations” (2024) Journal of Engineering, 30(11), pp. 50–70. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2024.11.04.
Section
Articles

How to Cite

“A Comprehensive Review of the Pipe Sticking Mechanism in Oil Well Drilling Operations” (2024) Journal of Engineering, 30(11), pp. 50–70. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2024.11.04.

Publication Dates

Received

2024-03-13

Revised

2024-05-23

Accepted

2024-07-10

Published Online First

2024-11-01

References

Adams, N., 1977. A field case study of differential-pressure pipe sticking. Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1977-Octob, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2523/6716-ms.

Ahmed, O.S., Beshir, M. A., Majed, A. Z. and Folorunsho, I. A., 2019. Stuck pipe early warning system utilizing moving window machine learning approach. Society of Petroleum Engineers - Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference 2019, ADIP 2019. https://doi.org/10.2118/197674-ms.

Al-Baiyat, I. and Heinze, L., 2012. Implementing artificial neural networks and support vector machines in stuck pipe prediction. Society of Petroleum Engineers - Kuwait International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition 2012, KIPCE 2012: People and Innovative Technologies to Unleash Challenging Hydrocarbon Resources, 2, pp. 880–892. https://doi.org/10.2118/163370-MS

Assi, A. H., 2017. Bit record analysis for bits evaluating and selection. Journal of Engineering, 23(10), pp. 97–113. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2017.10.08

Assi, A. H., Ramzi, R. K., Ahmed, S. S. and Alaa, T.A., 2018. Studying the effects of different polymers on rheological properties of water base muds. Journal of Engineering, 24(12), pp. 12–25. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2018.12.02

Assi, A. H., 2023. Introduction and investigation into oil well logging operations (Review). Journal of Engineering, 29(2), pp.72-91. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2023.02.05

Allawi, R.H., 2023. Chemical and mechanical model to analysis wellbore stability. Petroleum Science and Technology, 0(0), pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2023.2183966

Allawi, R.H. and Al-Jawad, M.S., 2021. Wellbore instability management using geomechanical modeling and wellbore stability analysis for Zubair shale formation in Southern Iraq. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 11(11), pp. 4047–4062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-021-01279-y

Abd Alhaleem, A., Sahi, S. and Assi, A. H., 2015. Bit performance in directional oil wells. Journal of Engineering, 21(11), pp.80-93. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2015.11.05

Aljubran, M.J., Al-Yami, A.S. and Madan, M.A., 2017. Best practices to prevent stuck pipe incidents in offshore shaly formations. SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, MEOS, Proceedings, 2017-March(January 2015), pp. 242–255. https://doi.org/10.2118/183717-MS

Alshaikh, A., Magana-Mora, A., Al Gharbi, S. and Al-Yami, A., 2019. Machine learning for detecting stuck pipe incidents: Data analytics and models evaluation. International Petroleum Technology Conference 2019, IPTC 2019. https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-19394-MS

Alshaikh, A. A., Albassam, M. K., Al Gharbi, S. H. and Al-Yami, A. S., 2018. Detection of stuck pipe early signs and the way toward automation. Society of Petroleum Engineers - Abu DhabiInternational Petroleum Exhibition and Conference 2018, ADIPEC 2018. https://doi.org/10.2118/192975-ms.

Alshaikh, A.A. and Amanullah, M., 2018. A comprehensive review of differential sticking, spotting fluids, and the current testing and evaluation methods. Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition 2018, SATS 2018. https://doi.org/10.2118/192169-MS

Amina, N.S. and Alhaleemb, A.A., 2018. Analysis of stuck pipe incidents in khabaz field. Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 19(4), pp.47-53.https://doi.org/10.31699/ijcpe.2018.4.6

Bradley, W.B., Jarman, D., Plott, R.S., Wood, R.D., Schofield, T.R., Auflick, R.A. and Cocking, D., 1991. Task force approach to reducing stuck pipe costs. Paper SPE 21999, SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 11-14 March (1991). https://doi.org/10.2523/21999-ms.

Belaskie, J.P., McCann, D.P. and Leshikar, J.F., 1994. Practical method to minimize stuck pipe integrating surface and MWD measurements. Drilling Conference - Proceedings, pp. 573–588. https://doi.org/10.2118/27494-MS

Brankovic, A., Matteucci, M., Restelli, M., Ferrarini, L., Piroddi, L., Spelta, A. and Zausa, F., 2020. A data-based approach for the prediction of stuck-pipe events in oil drilling operations. Society of Petroleum Engineers - Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference 2020, ADIP 2020. https://doi.org/10.2118/202625-MS

Boniface, O.A. and Marcus, N.M., 2015. A model to determine the effect of pore pressure and fracture gradient on stuck pipe management. Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, NAICE 2015. https://doi.org/10.2118/178379-ms

Courteille, J.M. and Zurdo, C., 1985. A new approach to differential sticking. Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1985-Septe. https://doi.org/10.2118/14244-MS

D'Amicis, S., Pagani, M., Matteucci, M., Piroddi, L.,Spelta, A. and Zausa, F., 2023. Stuck pipe prediction from rare events in oil drilling operations. Upstream Oil and Gas Technology, 11(November 2022), p. 100096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.upstre.2023.100096

Dupriest, F. E., Elks, W. C. and Ottesen, S., 2011. Design methodology and operational practices eliminate differential sticking. SPE Drilling and Completion, 26(1), pp. 115–123. https://doi.org/10.2118/128129-PA

Egbe, P., Al-Mousa, F. and Gadalla, A., 2020. A novel application of filter cake remover to free differential stuck pipe. Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition 2020, APOG 2020, pp. 20–22. https://doi.org/10.2118/202416-ms

Elkatatny, S. and Mahmoud, M., 2017. Real-time prediction of the rheological parameters of NaCl water-based drilling fluid using artificial neural networks. Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition 2017, pp. 1726–1740. https://doi.org/10.2118/187976-ms

Elmousalami, H.H. and Elaskary, M., 2020. Drilling stuck pipe classification and mitigation in the Gulf of Suez oil fields using artificial intelligence. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 10(5), pp. 2055–2068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-020-00857-w

Eren, T., Azeez, M. H. and Tawfeeq, B. A., 2013. Stuck pipe prevention while drilling wells to limestone & sandstone reservoirs – southern Iraq. Second International Conference on Water, Energy and the Environment, (September 2013).

Hakeem, M. M., Yusoff, H. M., Arriffin, F. M., Mohamad, A., Gomes, D., Jose, M. and Bidin, T. E. T., 2021. Utilizing artificial neural network for real-time prediction of differential sticking symptoms. International Petroleum Technology Conference, IPTC 2021. https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-21221-MS

Helio, S., 2007. Differentially stuck pipe: Early diagnostic and solution. Society of Petroleum Engineers, IADC/SPE 59127. https://doi.org/10.2523/59127-ms

Hempkins, W. B., Kingsborough, R. H., Lohec, W. E. and Nini, C. J., 1987. Multivariate statistical analysis of stuck drill pipe situations. SPE Drilling Engineering 2(3), pp. 237–244. SPE-14181-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/14181-PA.

Howard, J.A. and Glover, S.B., 1994. Tracking stuck pipe probability while drilling. Drilling Conference - Proceedings, pp. 901–910. https://doi.org/10.2523/27528-ms

Inoue, T., Nakagawa, Y., Wada, R., Miyoshi, K., Abe, S., Kuroda, K., Nishi, M., Bilen, H. and Mopuri, K.R., 2022. Early Stuck Detection Using Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning Approaches. In Offshore Technology Conference Asia (p. D041S043R002). OTC.

Inoue, T., Nakagawa, Y., Wada, R., Miyoshi, K., Abe, S., Kuroda, K., Nishi, M., Bilen, H. and Mopuri, K. R., 2022. Early stuck detection using supervised and unsupervised machine learning approaches. Offshore Technology Conference Asia, OTCA 2022. https://doi.org/10.4043/31376-MS

Isambourg, P., Ottesen, S., Benaissa, S. and Marti, J., 1999. Down-hole simulation cell for measurement of lubricity and differential pressure sticking. Proceedings of the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference, APDT, 1, pp. 427–438. https://doi.org/10.2118/52816-ms

Issa, M. A., A. Alrazzaq, A. A. and Mukhtar, Y., 2023. Review of the mechanisms for preventing, diagnosing, and treatment of pipe sticking in drilling operations. Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 24(3), pp. 133–140. https://doi.org/10.31699/ijcpe.2023.3.13

Jardine, S.I., McCann, D.P. and Barber, S.S., 1992. Advanced system for the early detection of sticking pipe. Drilling Conference - Proceedings, pp. 659–667. https://doi.org/10.2523/23915-ms

Malki, M. A., Abughaban, M. F., Guimaraes, T. T. and Alshawabkeh, A. A., 2023. Stuckpipe prediction model to detect and notify rig crew based on drilling parameters and physical models outputs. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, 2023-May. https://doi.org/10.2118/214604-MS

Miri, R., Sampaio, J., Afshar, M. and Lourenco, A., 2007. Development of artificial neural networks to predict differential pipe sticking in Iranian offshore oil fields. Society of Petroleum Engineers - 2nd International Oil Conference and Exhibition in

Mexico 2007, pp. 167–181. https://doi.org/10.2523/108500-ms

Mitchell, J. 2014. Trouble-Free Drilling, third edition. Houston, Texas: IADC Publications.

Muqeem, M.A., Weekse, A.E. and Al-Hajji, A.A., 2012. Stuck pipe best practices - A challenging approach to reducing stuck pipe costs. Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium and Exhibition 2012, pp. 756–765. https://doi.org/10.2118/160845-ms

Murillo, A., Neuman, J. and Samuel, R., 2009. Pipe sticking prediction and avoidance using adaptive fuzzy logic and neural network modeling. SPE Production and Operations Symposium, Proceedings, pp. 244–258. https://doi.org/10.2118/120128-ms

Magaji, M.A., Amoo, O. A. and Owoeye, O. O., 2002. An innovative approach to stuckpipe reduction in the Niger Delta. Society of Petroleum Engineers, IADC / SPE 74523, pp. 26–28 .

Nakagawa, Y., Inoue, T., Bilen, H., Mopuri, K. R., Miyoshi, K., Abe, S., Wada, R., Kuroda, K., Nishi, M. and Ogasawara, H., 2021. Approach for real-time prediction of pipe stuck risk using a long short-term memory autoencoder architecture. Society of Petroleum Engineers - Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, ADIP 2021. https://doi.org/10.2118/207805-MS

Nezhad, M. M., Ashoori, S., Hooshmand, P., Mirzaee, M., 2012. Stuck drill pipe prediction with networks neural in maroon field. J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res, 2(6), pp. 5570–5575.

Oriji, B.A. and Aire, I.S., 2020. A model approach to analytically identify stuck pipe and its mechanism in wellbore. European Journal of Engineering Research and Science, 5(3), pp. 387–394. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejers.2020.5.3.1845

Rabia, H., 2002. Well engineering & construction (pp. 288-289). London: Entrac Consulting Limited.

Reid, P. I., Meeten, G. H., Way, P. W., Clark, P., Chambers, B. D. and Gilmour, A., 1996. Mechanisms of differential sticking and a simple well site test for monitoring and optimizing drilling mud properties. Proceedings of the Drilling Conference, (5), pp. 493–502. https://doi.org/10.2523/35100-ms

Reid, P. I., Meeten, G. H., Way, P. W., Clark, Peter, Chambers, B. D., Gilmour, A. and Sanders, M.W., 2000. Differential-sticking mechanisms and a simple wellsite test for monitoring and optimizing drilling mud properties. SPE Drilling and Completion, 15(2), pp. 97–104. https://doi.org/10.2118/64114-PA

Shadizadeh, S. R., Karimi, F. and Zoveidavianpoor, M. 2010. Drilling stuck pipe prediction in iranian oil fields: an artificial neural network approach. Iranian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 7 (4), pp. 29–41. http://www.ijche.com/article_10326_1700.html.

Shoraka, S.A.R., Shadizadeh, S.R. and Pordel Shahri, M., 2011. Prediction of stuck pipe in Iranian South oil fields using multivariate statistical analysis. Society of Petroleum Engineers Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition 2011, pp. 865–874. https://doi.org/10.2118/151076-ms

Siruvuri, C., Nagarakanti, S. and Samuel, R., 2006. Stuck pipe prediction and avoidance: A convolutional neural network approach. SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Proceedings, pp. 161–166. https://doi.org/10.2118/98378

Spivey, B., Bailey, J., Pokluda, J. and Page, C., 2019. Data driven methods to monitor sticking friction while running pipe. Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2019-Septe. https://doi.org/10.2118/195891-ms

Weakley, R.R., 2000. Use of stuck pipe statistics to reduce the occurrence of stuck pipe. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 20410, 25, pp. 23–49

Yarim, G., Uchytil, R., May, R., Trejo, A. and Church, P., 2007. Stuck pipe prevention - A proactive solution to an old problem. Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 3, pp. 1434–1445. https://doi.org/10.2118/109914-ms

Zhao, J., Huang, W., Gao, D. and Zhao, L., 2022. Mechanism analysis of the regular pipe sticking in extended-reach drilling in the eastern South China Sea. 56th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. https://doi.org/10.56952/arma-2022-0563

Zhu, Q., Wang, Z. and Huang, J., 2019. Stuck pipe incidents prediction based on data analysis. Society of Petroleum Engineers - SPE Gas and Oil Technology Showcase and Conference 2019, GOTS 2019, (October), pp. 21–23. https://doi.org/10.2118/198672-ms

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.