The Potential of Recycling Used Engine Oil for Biogas Generation by Co-Digestion with Animals’ Manure: Experimental and Kinetic Study
محتوى المقالة الرئيسي
الملخص
This study investigates the potential of biogas recovery from used engine oil (UEO) by co-digestion with animals’ manure, including cow dung (CD), poultry manure (PM), and cattle manure (CM). The experimental work was carried out in anaerobic biodigesters at mesophilic conditions (37°C). Two groups of biodigesters were prepared. Each group consisted of 4 digesters. UEO was the main component in the first group of biodigesters with and without inoculum, whereby a mix of UEO and petroleum refinery oily sludge (ROS) was the component in the second group of biodigesters. The results revealed that for UEO-based biodigesters, maximum biogas production was 0.98, 1.23, 1.93, and 0 ml/g VS from UEO±CD, UEO±CM, UEO±PM, and UEO, respectively, whereby, for the UEO=ROS-based biodigesters, maximum biogas production was 3.49, 2.47, 3.64 and 2.44 ml/g VS from UEO+ROS±CD, UEO+ROS±CM, UEO+ROS±PM, and UEO+ROS, respectively. These results indicated that UEO was not feasible and efficient for biogas recovery since biogas production was very low in the first group of biodigesters compared to its recovery in the second group. A modified Gompertz model was applied to study the kinetics of the bio-digestion process. Measured and predicted values of biogas generation were fitted well with determination coefficients higher than 0.92.
تفاصيل المقالة
كيفية الاقتباس
تواريخ المنشور
المراجع
Abid, M.F., Mahmod, L.H., Breesam, S.T., Samie, W., 2018. Experimental study and analysis on degradation of oily sludge from process equipment by continuous hybrid treatment. Journal of Engineering, 24, pp. 35-49. Doi: 10.31026/j.eng.2018.07.03.
Abdulqader, M.A., Habeeb, O.A., Dheab, M.S., Saber, S.E.M., Rabet, A.O., Mohammed, G.J., Saleh, A.H., 2022. Solid fuel char production via pyrolysis process of oily sludge produced as a resulted in storage tanks at North Refineries Company Baiji. Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies, 34(1), pp. 199-210. Doi:10.52716/jprs.v12i1(Suppl.).631
Almukhtar, R.S., Alwasiti, A.A., Naser, M.T., 2012. Enhancement of Biogas production and organic reduction of sludge by different pre-treatment processes, Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 13(1), pp. 19-31.
Al-mashhadani, M.K.H., Wilkinson, S.J., Zimmerman, W.B., 2015. Laboratory preparation of simulated sludge for anaerobic digestion experimentation. Journal of Engineering, 21(6), pp. 131-145. Doi: 10.31026/j.eng.2015.06.09
Alrawashdeh, K.A., Gul, E., Yang, Q., Yang, H., Bartocci, P., Fantozzi, F., 2020. Effect of heavy metals in the performance of anaerobic digestion of olive mill waste. Processes, 8(9), P. 1146. Doi:10.3390/pr8091146
American Public Health Association (APHA), 2005. Standard methods of the examination of water and wastewater, Washington, DC. https://www.standardmethods.org/
Ayadi, M., Ahoui, S., Awad, S., Abderrabba, M., Andres, Y., 2020. Production of biogas from olive pomace. Evergreen Joint Journal of Novel Carbon Resource Sciences & Green Asia Strategy, 07(2), pp. 228-233. Doi:10.5109/4055224
Borowski, S., Kubacki, P., 2015. Co-digestion of pig slaughterhouse waste with sewage sludge. Waste Management, 40, pp. 119–126. Doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.021
Choong, Y.Y., Norli, I., Abdullah, A.Z., Yhaya, M.F., 2016. Impacts of trace element supplementation on the performance of anaerobic digestion process: A critical review. Bioresource Technology, 209, 369–379. Doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.028
Dechrugsa, S., Kantachote, D., Chaiprapat, S., 2013. Effects of inoculum to substrate ratio, substrate mix ratio and inoculum source on batch co-digestion of grass and pig manure. Bioresource Technology, 146, pp. 101–108. Doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.051
Ejimofor, M.I., Ezemagu, I.G., Menkit, M.C., 2020. Biogas production using coagulation sludge obtained from paint wastewater decontamination: characterization and anaerobic digestion kinetics. Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 3, P. 100024. Doi:10.1016/j.crgsc.2020.100024
Ellacuriaga, M., García-Cascallana, J., Gómez, X. ,2021. Biogas Production from Organic Wastes: Integrating Concepts of Circular Economy. Fuels, 2,pp 144–167. https://doi.org/10.3390/
Ghaleb, A.A.S., Kutty, S.R.M., Salih, G.H.A., Jagaba, A.H., Noor, A., Kumar, V., Almahbashi, N.M.Y, Saeed, A. A. H, Al-dhawi, B.N.S.,2021. Sugarcane bagasse as a co-substrate with oil-refinery biological sludge for biogas production using batch mesophilic anaerobic co digestion technology: effect of carbon/nitrogen ratio. Water, 13(5), P. 590. Doi:10.3390/w13050590
Hassan, M., Ding, W., Shi, Z., Zhao, S., 2016. Methane enhancement through co-digestion of chicken manure and thermo-oxidative cleaved wheat straw with waste activated sludge: A C/N optimization case. Bioresource Technology, 211, pp. 534–541. Doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.148
Hanif, M.U., Zwawi, M., Algarni, M., Bahadar, A., Iqbal, H., Capareda, S.C., Hanif, M.A., Waqas, A., Hossain, N., Siddiqui, M.T.H., Sabzoi Nizamuddin, S., and Asma Jamil, A.,2022. The Effects of using pretreated cotton gin trash on the production of biogas from anaerobic co-digestion with cow manure and sludge. Energies, 15(2), pp. 490-502. Doi:10.3390/en15020490
Ismail, Z.Z., and Talib, A.R., 2016. Recycled medical cotton industry waste as a source of biogas recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, pp. 4413-4418. Doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.069
Kafle, G.K., and Chen, L., 2016. Comparison on batch anaerobic digestion of five different livestock manures and prediction of biochemical methane potential (BMP) using different statistical models. Waste Management, 48, pp. 492–502. Doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.10.021
Kiani, M.K.D., Parsaee, M., Ardebili, S.M.S., Reyes, I.P., Fuess, L.T., and Karimi, K., 2022. Different bioreactor configurations for biogas production from sugarcane vinasse: A comprehensive review. Biomass and Bioenergy, 161, P. 106446. Doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106446
McKennedy, J., and Sherlock, O., 2015. Anaerobic digestion of marine macroalgae: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, pp. 1781–1790. Doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.101
Montañés, R., Solera, R., Pérez, M., 2015. Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and sugar beet pulp lixiviation in batch reactors: Effect of temperature. Bioresource Technology, 180, pp. 177–184. Doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.056
Montes, J.A., Rico, C., 2020. Biogas potential of wastes and by-products of the alcoholic beverage production industries in the Spanish region of Cantabria. Applied Sciences, 10, P. 7481. Doi:10.3390/app10217481
Muhammad, M.B., Chandrab, R., 2021. Enhancing biogas and methane production from leaf litter of neem by co-digestion with vegetable waste: Focus on the effect of tannin. Biomass and Bioenergy, 147, P. 106007. Doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106007
Pavi, S., Kramer, L.E., Gomes, L.P., Miranda, L.A.S., 2017. Biogas production from co- digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste and fruit and vegetable waste. Bioresource Technology, 228, pp. 362–367. Doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.003
Perman, E., Schnürer, A., Björn, A., Moested, J., 2022. Serial anaerobic digestion improves protein degradation and biogas production from mixed food waste. Biomass and Bioenergy, 161, P. 106478. Doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106478
Rashama, C. Ijoma, G., Matambo, T., 2019. Biogas generation from by-products of edible oil processing: a review of opportunities, challenges and strategies. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 9, pp. 803–826. Doi:10.1007/s13399-019-00385-6
Rivero, M., Solera, R., Perez, M., 2014. Anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of sewage sludge with glycerol: Enhanced biohydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(6), pp. 2481-2488. Doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.006
Sampson, I.E., 2020. Anaerobic digestion technology for the treatment of petroleum sludge. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research (Sciences, Technology & Engineering), 6(9), pp. 2488-9849. Doi:10.46654/ij.24889849.e69023
Sevillano, C.B.A., Chiappero, M., Gomez, X., Fiore, S., Martínez, J., 2020. Improving the anaerobic digestion of wine-industry liquid wastes: treatment by electro-Oxidation and use of biochar as an additive. Energies. 13(22), P. 5971. Doi:10.3390/en13225971
Sherry, A., Grant, R.J., Aitken, C.M., Jones, M., Bowler, B.F.J., Larter, S.R., Head, I.M., Gray, N.D., 2020. Methanogenic crude oil-degrading microbial consortia are not universally abundant in anoxic environments. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 155, pp.105085-105097. Doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2020.105085
Shi, Y., Liu, M., Li, J., Yao, Y., Tang, J., Niu, Q., 2022. The dosage-effect of biochar on anaerobic digestion under the suppression of oily sludge: Performance variation, microbial community succession and potential detoxification mechanisms. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 421, pp.126819-126830. Doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126819
Soltaninejad, A., Jazini, M.H., Karimi, K., 2022. Biorefinery for efficient xanthan gum, ethanol, and biogas production from potato crop residues. Biomass and Bioenergy, 158, P. 106354. Doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106354
Tabatabaei, M., Aghbashlo, M., Valijanian, E., Panahi, H.K.S., Nizami, A., Ghanavati, H., Sulaiman, A., Mirmohamadsadeghi, S., Karimi, K., 2020. A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 1: Upstream strategies. Renewable Energy, 146, pp. 1204-1220. Doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.037
Ware, A., Power, N., 2018. What is the effect of mandatory pasteurisation on the biogas transformation of solid slaughterhouse wastes? Waste Management, 48, pp. 503–512. Doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.10.013
Wandera, S.M., Qiao, W., Algapani, D.E., Bi, S.,Yin, D., Qi, X., Liu, Y., Dach , J., Dong, R., 2018. Searching for possibilities to improve the performance of full-scale agricultural biogas plants. Renewable Energy, 116, pp.720-727. Doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.087
Yang, Q., Zhang, C., Li, L., Xu, w., 2020. Anaerobic co-digestion of oil sludge with corn stover for efficient biogas production. Sustainability, 12(5), pp.1861-1870. Doi:10.3390/su12051861