RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN PROCEDURE OF AXIALLY LOADED PILES

محتوى المقالة الرئيسي

Mohammed Yousif Fattah

الملخص

Geotechnical engineering involves many different and complex materials and many different mechanisms of behaviour. The direct use of experience as a guide to the prediction and design is effective provided these are understood. Geotechnical engineering is a relatively new science. Its successful application to prediction requires realistic assumptions to be made, and predictions must be tested against reality. Methods of prediction need then to be refined. An example of the importance of making realistic assumptions is examined in this paper. It includes the effects of soil properties on the ultimate capacity of axially loaded piles.
Better analysis offers better prediction and better understanding. Both are only possible when reality is modelled. There are occasions when mechanisms are too complex for predictive analysis. Prediction must then be based directly on experience, applied with an understanding of the mechanisms involved. Moreover, methods of analysis may become too sophisticated for everyday use. However, pseudo-analysis, involving standardized methods based on oversimplified and unrealistic mechanisms of behaviour and material properties, is dangerous. The use of engineering experience as a guide to prediction and design may offer a more effective alternative, provided it is based on a realistic understanding of mechanisms and materials.
In this paper, a procedure is recommended to estimate the bearing capacity of axially loaded piles based on reliability calculations. The procedure is an extension of the point estimate method in which the expected values of the standard deviation of the capacity and demand functions are calculated. The probability of failure, the reliability, central factor of safety and reliability index are calculated as appropriate. The procedure is then applied to two cases where the pile in the first case is driven in sand while in the second, it is driven in clay.

تفاصيل المقالة

القسم

Articles

كيفية الاقتباس

"RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN PROCEDURE OF AXIALLY LOADED PILES" (2010) مجلة الهندسة, 16(01), ص 4462–4477. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2010.01.06.

المراجع

 Afolayan, J. O., (1998), “Optimum structural dimensions for fire resistance in reinforced concrete construction”, Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 17, No. (2), pp 13 - 18.

 Christian, J. T., Ladd, C. C. and Baecher, G. B., (1994), “Reliability applied to slope stability analysis”, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 120, No. 12, pp 2180 - 2207.

 Christian, J. T. and Baecher, G. B., (2001), Discussion of “Factor of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering”, by J. M. Duncan, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 127, No. 8, pp 700 - 703.

 Ditlevsen, O., (1981), “Uncertainty Modeling”, McGraw-Hill, New York.

 Duncan, J.M., (2000), “Factors of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 126, No. 4, pp 307 - 316.

 Ellingwood, B., Galambos, T. V., MacGregor, J. G., and Cornell, C. A., (1980), “Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard A58”, Nat. Bur. Stand. Spec. Publ. 577, Washington, D.C.

 Grigoriu, M., (1983), “Reliability of chain and ductile parallel systems”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 5, pp 1175 - 1188.

 Gui, S., Zhang, R., Turner, J. P, and Xu, X., (2000), “Probabilistic slope stability analysis with stochastic soil hydraulic conductivity”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. ASCE, Vol. 126, No. 1, pp 1 - 9.

 Harr, M. E., (2002), “Accounting for Variability (Reliability)”, Chapter 16 in “The Civil Engineering Handbook”, edited by W. F. Chen and J. Y. R. Liew, Second Edition, CRC Press.

 Haugen, E. B., (1968), “Probabilistic approaches to design”, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

 Kaymaz, I., McMahon, C., and Xianyi, M., (1998), “Reliability based structural optimisation using the response surface method and Monte Carlo simulation”, 8th International Machine Design and Production Conference, Ankara.

 Phoon, K. K., (2004)., “Towards reliability-based design for geotechnical engineering”, Special lecture for Korean Geotechnical Society, Seoul, 9 July 2004

 Phoon, K. K., Kulhawy, F. H. & Grigoriu, M. D., (1995), Reliability-based design of foundations for transmission line structures. Report TR-105000, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto. (http://www.eng.nus.edu.sg/civil/aboutus/facultystaff/cvepkk/reliability.html).

 Rosenblueth, E., (1975), “Point estimates for probability moments”, Proceedings, Natl. Acad. Sci., USA. 72(10).

 Rowe, R. K. and Fraser, M. J., (1995), “Effect of uncertainty in the assessment of the potential impact of waste disposal facilities”, Geoenvironment 2000, Geotechnical Special Publication, No. 46, ASCE, New York, pp 270 - 284.

 Terzaghi, K. ,Peck, P. B. and Mesri, G., (1996), “Soil mechanics in engineering practice”, 3rd edition, New York: Wiley.

 Tomlinson, M.J., (1993), ”Pile Design and Construction”, Fourth edition, Pitman Edition.

 Vaughan, P. R., (1994), “Assumption, prediction and reality in geotechnical engineering”, Geotechnique, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp 573-609.

الأعمال الأكثر قراءة لنفس المؤلف/المؤلفين

1 2 > >>