Risk Assessment in BOT Contracts using AHP Technique
Main Article Content
Abstract
The process of risk assessment in the build-operate transfer (BOT) project is very important to identify and analyze the risks in order to make the appropriate decision to respond to them. In this paper, AHP Technique was used to make the appropriate decision regarding response to the most prominent risks that were generated in BOT projects, which includes a comparison between the criteria for each risk as well as the available alternatives and by mathematical methods using matrices to reach an appropriate decision to respond to each risk.Ten common risks in BOT contracts are adopted for analysis in this paper, which is grouped into six main risk headings.The procedures followed in this paper are the questionnaire method to assign the weights of each criterion and each alternative based on the evaluations of 10 experts in BOT contracts after building the questionnaire model.The appropriate decision was reached to respond to each risk, and then the best measures taken were made based on literature reviews of previous research regarding the procedures for risk response plans.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Al-AZEMI, K., BHAMRA, R., SALMAN, A., 2014. Risk Management Framework For Build, Operate And Transfer (BOT) Projects In Kuwait,Journal Of Civil Engineering And Management, Vol. 20(3), pp., 415–433.
BHUSHAN, N.,and RAI, K., 2004. Strategic Decision Making: Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Springer, Berlin, 9, 11-21.http://www.springer.com/978-1-85233-756-8
CHO, F., 2019. Analytic Hierarchy Process for Survey Data in R,Vignettes For The Ahpsurvey Package, (ver 0.4.0).
HSIAO, H., 2000. Risk Management In BOT Project, A Thesis Submitted To The Department Of Civil And Environmental Engineering In Partial Fulfillment Of The Requirements For The Degree Of Master Of Science In Civil And Environmental Engineering At The Massachusetts Institute Of Technology, p 63.
HUANG, M., 1999. BOT in China: Opportunities and Challenges for Foreign Firms, A Thesis Submitted To The Department Of Civil And Environmental Engineering In Partial Fulfillment Of The Requirements For The Degree Of Master Of Science In Civil And Environmental Engineering At The Massachusetts Institute Of Technology, pp. 55-67.
ISO GUIDE 73:2009(E/F). Risk Management — Vocabulary.
KHAHRO, S. ALI, T., MEMON, N., and AKHUND, M., 2017. Effect Of Change Orders On Project Duration,IJCIET, Vol. 8, Iss. 6, pp. 484–490.
LIN, J., 2003. The Conflicts and Risks in BOT Projects, A Thesis Submitted To The Department of Civil Engineering In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements For The Degree of Master of Science In Civil Engineering At The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp., 67-77.
LLANTO, G., 2008. Build-Operate-Transfer for Infrastructure Development: Lessons from the Philippine Experience, in Kumar, N. (ed.), International Infrastructure Development in East Asia -Towards Balanced Regional Development and Integration, ERIA Research Project Report 2007-2, Chiba: IDE-JETRO, pp.319-359.
RASHEED, E., 2015. Valuation the Impact of Risks on the Goals and the Safety of Construction Projects in Iraq,Journal of Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 1-19.
SAATY, RW, 1987. The Analytic Hierarchy Process-What It Is and How It Is Used.Mathematical Modelling, 9 (3 - 5), pp., 161– 176. https:doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.
SAATY, T., 1990. How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, European Journal of Operational Research, 48, PP., 9-26.
SAATY, T., 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,Int. J. Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, 83.
SHADHAR, A., MAHMOOD, B., 2018. Risks of Design Stage in Iraqi Construction Project,Journal of Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 114-121. DOI: 10.31026/j.eng.2018.03.09.
SAATY, T.,and VARGAS,L. G., 2012. Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of the AnalyticHierarchy Process, International Series in Operations Research and Management Science 175, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6_2, Springer, Science + Business Media New York.
World Economic Forum, 2015. Mitigation of Political and Regulatory Risk in Infrastructure Projects, REF 050215, p 19.