Effect of Soil-Structure Interaction on the Response of Machine Foundation Subjected to Seismic Loading: A Review Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
This review provides a detailed look at the current knowledge and approaches related to Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction (DSSI) in machine foundation design, focusing on its substantial impact on seismic response and structural stability. The significance of this interaction in structural design, especially in areas prone to seismic activity, is pivotal. The paper begins by exploring various modeling methods, like the Finite Element Method (FEM), highlighting their importance in understanding the intricate aspects of DSSI, such as energy loss and interface behavior. It is evident from the studies that FEM is particularly effective in analyzing settlement under reciprocating loads. Soil-structure interaction (SSI) is a complex phenomenon that can positively and negatively affect the seismic performance of machine foundations. Several factors, including embedment depth, soil stiffness, and foundation properties, govern the influence of SSI. This review discusses the dual nature of SSI and highlights the importance of considering the interaction between soil properties, foundation design, seismic loads, and interaction effects. In addition, it identifies the limitations of the current research and advocates for more accurate and inclusive models and extensive empirical studies to address real-world complexities and uncertainties. In conclusion, this review offers crucial insights and foundational knowledge for future innovative design solutions and advanced research methodologies and significantly contributes to developing resilient and reliable structural designs in seismic-prone regions. The emphasis is on the need for more nuanced and comprehensive studies to further the understanding and application of DSSI in machine foundation design.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Abdel-Rohman, M. and Al-Sanad, H., 1996. Control of Nonlinear Vibrations of Foundations Built in Sandy Soil. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2(1), pp.53-68. Doi:10.1177/107754639600200104
ACI 351.3R, 2018. Foundations for Dynamic Equipment. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
Al-Azawi, T.K., Al-Azawi, R.K. and Al-Jaberi, Z.K., 2006. Stiffness and damping properties of embedded machine foundations. Journal of Engineering, 12(2), pp.429-444. Doi:10.31026/j.eng.2006.02.19.
Al-Busoda, B.S. and Alahmar, M.M., 2014. The behavior of gypseous soil under vertical vibration loading. Journal of Engineering, 20(1), pp.21-30. Doi:10.31026/j.eng.2014.01.02
Alhasso, N.K. and Qasim, Q.N., 2021. Settlement Analysis of machine foundation Under Reciprocating Load using FEM. Al-Rafidain Engineering Journal (AREJ), 26(1), pp.37-43. Doi:10.33899/rengj.2020.128010.1057.
Allawi, A.A. and Mohammed, Q.S., 2022. Numerical analysis of a concrete foundation under a combination of a dynamic and a seismic load. Journal of Engineering, 28(2), pp.18-39. Doi:10.31026/j.eng.2022.02.02
Al-Mosawi, M.J., Fattah, M.Y. and Al-Ameri, A.F., 2015. Effect of saturation of sandy soil on the displacement amplitude of soil foundation system under vibration. Journal of Engineering, 21(2), pp.20-36. Doi:10.31026/j.eng.2015.02.02
An, D. and Liu, T., 2021. Seismic test and simulation of spring vibration isolated foundation for turbo-generator. Shock and Vibration, 2021, pp.1-16. Doi:10.1155/2021/8884920
An, D. and Qu, T.J., 2018. Seismic behavior of turbine-generator foundation under strong earthquake action in different directions. Advances in Civil Engineering, pp. 1-10. Doi:10.1155/2018/2506264
Anand, V. and Kumar, S.S., 2018, November. Seismic soil-structure interaction: a state-of-the-art review. In Structures (Vol. 16, pp. 317-326). Doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2018.10.009
Arya, S.C., O'Neill, M.W. and Pincus, G., 1979. Design of structures and foundations for vibrating machines. Golf publishing Company, London.
Aslam, M., Godden, W.G. and Scalise, D.T., 1980. Earthquake rocking response of rigid bodies. Journal of the Structural Division, 106(2), pp.377-392. Doi:10.1061/jsdeag.0005363
Asmis, G.J.K., 1979. Response of rotating machinery subjected to seismic excitation. In Engineering design for earthquake environments, 12(4), 215-225.
Bapir, B., Abrahamczyk, L., Wichtmann, T. and Prada-Sarmiento, L.F., 2023. Soil-structure interaction: A state-of-the-art review of modeling techniques and studies on seismic response of building structures. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9, p.1120351. Doi:10.3389/fbuil.2023.1120351
Barkan, D.D.,1962. Dynamics of Bases and Foundations, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, U.S.A.
Bhandari, P.K. and Sengupta, A., 2014. Dynamic analysis of machine foundation. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(4), pp.169-76.
Bhatia, K.G.,1981. Soil Structure Interaction Effects on the Response of 210 MW TG Frame Foundation, Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, U.S.A., Vol. 1, pp. 319–322.
Bhatia, K.G.,1984. Machine Foundation in Power Plant and Other Industries—Case Studies. Proceedings of the International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, St. Louis, U.S.A., 2, pp. 775–779.
Bhatia, K.G.,2006. Machine Foundation Design—A State of the Art, Journal of Structural Engineering, SERC, 33(1), pp. 69–80.
Bhatia, K.G. and Sinha, K.N., 1977. Effect of Soil-Structure Interaction on the Behaviour of Machine Foundations. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Soil-Structure Interaction, Roorkee, pp. 399-404.
Bhatia, K.G., 2008a. Foundations for industrial machines: a handbook for practicing engineers, rotary machines, reciprocating machines, impact machines, vibration isolation system. CRC Press.
Bhatia, K.G., 2008b. Foundations for industrial machines and earthquake effects. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, Paper, (495), pp.1-2.
Bounds, W.L., Louis, F.G., Sheikh, A.H., Brant, W.D., Moll, J., Smalley, A.J., Fang, S.J., Pearce, I.W., Smith, P.A., Harsh, S. and Rossi, A., 2004. Foundations for dynamic equipment, ACI Committee.
Damgaard, M. and Andersen, J.K., 2012, June. Natural frequency and damping estimation of an offshore wind turbine structure. In ISOPE International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference (pp. ISOPE-I). ISOPE.
Desai, K.Y., Dhut, V.R. and Sheth, K.N., 2022. Dynamic analysis of block-type machine foundation using barkan’s model for various soil parameters. In ASPS Conference Proceedings, 1(4), pp. 1025-1031. Doi:10.38208/acp.v1.616
Dobry, R., Oweis, I. and Urzua, A., 1976. Simplified procedures for estimating the fundamental period of a soil profile. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 66(4), pp.1293-1321.
El Naggar, M.H., 2000. Evaluation of performance of machine foundation under blast-induced excitation. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 48.
Fang, M., Wang, T. and Li, H., 2012. Dynamic behavior of turbine foundation considering full interaction among facility, structure and soil. In Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 24-28).
Fattah, M.Y., Al-Mufty, A.A.A.A. and Al-Badri, H.T., 2007. Design charts for machine foundations. Journal of Engineering, 13(4). Doi:10.31026/j.eng.2007.04.07.
Fleischer, P.S. and Trombik, P.G., 2008. Turbo generator machine foundations subjected to earthquake loadings. In The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, October 12-17, Beijing, China.
Gazetas, G. ,1991. Soil-structure interaction in seismic engineering. Prentice Hall. London.
Han, Y.C., 2010. Dynamic analysis for foundation of vibrating equipments considering soil-structure interaction. In Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (pp. 71-76). Doi:10.1061/41102(375)7
Hassan, M.M., 2017. Parameters affecting the dynamic behavior of the machine foundations: case study. In: Proceedings of the 6th CSCE-CRC International Construction Specialty Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 31 May-3 June 2017. Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, pp.1-10.
Heron, C., Haigh, S. and Madabhushi, G., 2014. Susceptibility of shallow foundation to rocking and sliding movements during seismic loading. In Seismic Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Structures, pp. 419-432. Doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00458-7_23
Hongwang, M., 2012. Seismic analysis for wind turbines including soil-structure interaction combining vertical and horizontal earthquake. In 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal.
IS 1893 (Part 4), 2005. Indian Standard Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Bureau of Indian Standards, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. Part, 4.
IS 2974 (Part 3), 1992. Indian Standard Design and Construction of Machine Foundations—Code of Practice, Part 3: Foundations for Rotary Type Machines (Medium and High Frequency) (Second Revision), Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
Jaimes, M.A. and Candia, G., 2020. Seismic risk of sliding ground-mounted rigid equipment. Engineering Structures, 204, p.110066. Doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110066
Jan, S.F. and Wu, S.C., 2010. Dynamic analysis and design of large compressor foundations in high seismic zone. In Structures Congress 2010, pp. 2702-2713. Doi:10.1061/41130(369)244
Kausel, E. ,1974. Finite element analysis of dynamic soil-structure interaction problems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2(3), 287-302.
Kjørlaug, R.A. and Kaynia, A.M., 2015. Vertical earthquake response of megawatt‐sized wind turbine with soil‐structure interaction effects. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 44(13), pp.2341-2358. Doi:10.1002/eqe.2590
Kourkoulis, R.S., Lekkakis, P.C., Gelagoti, F.M. and Kaynia, A.M., 2014. Suction caisson foundations for offshore wind turbines subjected to wave and earthquake loading: effect of soil–foundation interface. Géotechnique, 64(3), pp.171-185. Doi:10.1680/geot.12.p.179
Lee, T.H. and Wesley, D.A., 1973. Soil-structure interaction of nuclear reactor structures considering through-soil coupling between adjacent structures. Nuclear engineering and design, 24(3), pp.374-387. Doi:10.1016/0029-5493(73)90007-1
Liu, W. and Novak, M., 1995. Dynamic behaviour of turbine‐generator‐foundation systems. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 24(3), pp.339-360. Doi:10.1002/eqe.4290240304
Liu, Z., 2013. Design of foundations for large dynamic equipment in a high seismic region. In Structures Congress 2013: Bridging Your Passion with Your Profession, pp. 1403-1414. Doi:10.1061/9780784412848.124
Logan Jr, E., 2003. Handbook of turbomachinery. CRC Press. Doi:10.1201/9780203911990
Lombardi, D., Bhattacharya, S. and Wood, D.M., 2013. Dynamic soil–structure interaction of monopile supported wind turbines in cohesive soil. Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, 49, pp.165-180. Doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.015
Luco, J. E., Wolf, J. P., & Seed, H. B.,1989. Clas si: A computer program for the analysis of soil-structure interaction problems. Report No. UCB/EERC-89/19, University of California, Berkeley, CA. Doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-032582-8.50027-0
Luo, G.S., Fang, J.X. and Wang, J., 2009. Aseismic performance of spring supported turbo-generator foundation. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 42(S1), pp.436-442.
Lysmer, J., and Waas, G. ,1972. Finite element method for soil-structure interaction problems. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 98(6), 859-877.
Mohammed, Q.S., 2022. Dynamic Behavior of Machine Foundations on layered sandy soil under Seismic Loadings. Journal of Engineering, 28(8), pp.1-20. Doi:10.31026/j.eng.2022.08.01
Mylonakis, G. and Gazetas, G., 2000. Seismic soil-structure interaction: beneficial or detrimental?. Journal of earthquake engineering, 4(3), pp.277-301. Doi:10.1080/13632460009350372
Naggar, M.H.E., 2003. Performance evaluation of vibration-sensitive equipment foundations under ground-transmitted excitation. Canadian geotechnical journal, 40(3), pp.598-615. Doi:10.1139/t03-014
Najm, A.A., AL-Sulayvani, B.J. and Jaro, M.N., 2022. Vertical Displacement Analysis of Embedded Square Foundation Under Vertical Dynamic Load. In Geotechnical Engineering and Sustainable Construction: Sustainable Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 409-421. Singapore: Springer Singapore. Doi:10.1007/978-981-16-6277-5_33
Pantelides, C.P., 1991. Control of Seismic Response of Structures. In Second International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Missouri S&T.
Prakash, S. and Puri, V.K. ,1988. Foundations for machines: analysis and design, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
Prakash, S. and Puri, V.K., 2006. Foundations for vibrating machines. Journal of structural Engineering, 33(1), pp.13-29.
Prowell, I., Elgamal, A. and Lu, J., 2010. Modeling the influence of soil structure interaction on the seismic response of a 5 MW wind turbine. Fifth International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, San Diego, California, USA.
Puri, V.K. and Prakash, S., 2007. Foundations for Seismic Loads. In Dynamic Response and Soil Properties (pp. 1-10). Doi:10.1061/40904(223)11
Rajkumar, K., Ayothiraman, R. and Matsagar, V.A., 2021. Effects of Soil-Structure Interaction on Torsionally Coupled Base Isolated Machine Foundation under Earthquake Load. Shock and Vibration, 2021, pp.1-8. Doi:10.1155/2021/6686646
Ramesh, S. and Kumar, V.V.,2015. Parametric Study on an Industrial Structure for Various Dynamic Loads. IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, pp.2319-1163. Doi:10.15623/ijret.2015.0402017
Rao, C.K. and Mirza, S., 1989. Seismic analysis of high-speed rotating machinery. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 111(3), pp.395-402. Doi:10.1016/0029-5493(89)90250-1
Rausch, E.,1950. Maschinen fundamente. VDI, Dusseldorf, Germany (in German).
Richart, F.E., 1970. Vibrations of soils and foundations Prentice-Hall. Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Roesset, J.M., 1977. Soil amplification in earthquakes, Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering, CS Desai and JT Christian, eds.
Romo, M.P., Mendoza, M.J. and Garcia, S.R., 2000. Geotechnical factors in seismic design of foundations state-of-the-art report. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 33(3), pp.347-370. Doi:10.5459/bnzsee.33.3.347-370
Saran, S., 1999. Soil Dynamics and Machine Foundations. New Delhi, India: Galgotia Publications pvt ltd. Doi: 10.1520/STP33641S
Singh, Y. and Nagpal, A.K., 1993. Estimating fundamental period of soil profiles. Geotechnical Engineering, 24(2), pp.167-74. http://worldcat.org/issn/00465828
Smith, C.B., 1976. Seismic and Operational Vibration Problems in Nuclear Power Plants. Shock and Vibration Digest, 8(11), pp.3-13. Doi:10.1177/058310247600801103
Srinivasan, V. and Soni, A.H., 1984. Seismic analysis of a rotor‐bearing system. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 12(3), pp.287-311. Doi:10.1002/eqe.4290120302
Stewart, J.P., Seed, R.B. and Fenves, G.L., 1999. Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. II: Empirical findings. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 125(1), pp.38-48. Doi:10.1061/(asce)10900241(1999)125: 1(38)
Su, W.C. and Henried, A.G., 1995. Seismic response of flexible rotating machines. In 7th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 229-236.
Su, W.C., Hernried, A.G. and Yim, S.C., 2000. Seismic response of rotating machines–structure–RFBI systems. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 29(2), pp.213-240. Doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(200002)29:2%3C213::aid-eqe900%3E3.0.co;2-4
Suarez, L.E., Singh, M.P. and Rohanimanesh, M.S., 1992. Seismic response of rotating machines. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 21(1), pp.21-36. Doi:10.1002/eqe.4290210102
Thakare, A.U. and Rangari, S.M., 2015. Effect of Seismic Parameters on Analysis of Turbo-Generator Foundation. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 4(05). Doi:10.17577/ijertv4is050554
Tripathy, S. and Desai, A.K., 2017. Investigation of dynamic behaviour for turbo generator frame foundation through experimental and computational approach. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 11(5), pp.513-523. Doi:10.1080/19386362.2016.1239037
Veletsos, A.S., 1993. Design concepts for dynamics of soil-structure interaction. In Developments in dynamic soil-structure interaction (pp. 307-325). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1755-5_13
Vicencio, F. and Cruz, E.F., 2021. A high order nonlinear study to evaluate the seismic response of rotating machines–structure–soil foundation systems. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 25(14), pp.2775-2807. Doi:10.1080/13632469.2019.1651422
Vicencio, F., Cruz, E.F. and Valdivia, D., 2012. Evaluation of different modeling options for seismic analysis of large turbine-generator systems and their foundation. In Fifteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
Wey, E., Wong, S. and Bounds, W., 2013. Vibratory machine foundation design: when to perform a dynamic analysis. In Structures Congress 2013: bridging your passion with your profession, pp. 1437-1446. Doi:10.1061/9780784412848.127
Wolf, J., 1985. Dynamic soil-structure interaction. Prentice Hall, Inc.
Woods, R.D. and Stokoe, K.H., 1985. Shallow seismic exploration in soil dynamics. In Richart commemorative lectures (pp. 120-156). ASCE.
Zhao, X. and Maisser, P., 2006. Seismic response analysis of wind turbine towers including soil-structure interaction. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics, 220(1), pp.53-61. Doi:10.1243/146441905X73691
Zohra, B.F., Fouad, B.A. and Mohamed, C., 2022. Soil-structure interaction interfaces literature review. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 15(12), pp.1130. Doi:10.1007/s12517-022-10336-7