Challenges of Soil-Structure Interaction Problems– A Review
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research deals with the review of former research that made to solve the challenges and complexities of both static and dynamic soil structure interaction through discussing advanced computational models and their applications and exploring methods of solving the challenges of soil structure interaction in foundation engineering to provide a guide for the engineering community through the complexes of soil structure interaction. It was found that the numerical analysis for both static and dynamic soil structure interaction using the finite element method with the aid of advanced computional models is ideal for dealing with the non-linearity of soil and structure properties and loading conditions and that the use of interface elements which is essential for idealization of forces between two different mediums and that the interaction effect of adjacent structures cannot be ignored in the seismic design of high raised buildings especially for buildings in the middle and the effect of non-linearity of soil properties can be ignored in seismic design upon increasing in soil stiffness, slenderness ratio of buildings and when the foundation soil was improved. The cost and time of dynamic soil structure analysis can be reduced by using the equivalent pier method, Mohr Columb Model in ABAQUS software, multi step and data-based method and there is a need to add guidelines on the implementation of soil structural interaction in seismic codes in order to include it in the regular design practice of structures. Moreover, it was found that the non-linearity and uncertainty of soil properties greatly affect the safety of structures and it is essential to consider static soil structure interaction analysis to assure safe and economical design of structures.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Abd Al-Kaream, K.W., Fattah, M.Y., and Hameedi, M.K., 2020. Compressibilty and strenght development of soft soil by polypropylene fiber. International Journal of Geomaterials, 22(93), pp.91 – 97. https://doi.org/10.21660/2022.93.3206.
Abdulameer, H.Q., Sarsam, S.I., and Ahmed, M.D., 2014. Studying the behavior of asphalt stabilized gepseous soil for earth embankment model. Journal of Engineering, 20(5), pp. 25-43. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2014.05.02.
Alhamdi, M.K., and Albusoda, B.S., 2021. A Review on Deep mixing method for soil improvement. In Proceedings of 2021 IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1105 012110. (pp. 1-27). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1105/1/012110.
Albusoda, B.S., and Salem, A.K., 2016. The effect of interaction on pile-raft system settlement subjected to earthquake excitation. Applied Resarch Journal, 2(4), pp. 205-214. https://doi.org/JR_ARJ-2-4_007.
Alhalbusi, G.S., and Al- Saidi, A.A., 2023. Enhancing the ability of the square footing to resist positive and negative eccentric inclined loading using an inclined skirt . E3S Web of Conferences 427, 01020. September 2023 E3S Web of Conferences 427(4):01020. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342701020.
Al-Jeznawi, D., Jais, I.B.M., and Albusoda, B.S.,b2024. Numerical study of the seismic response of closed-ended pipe pile in cohesionless soils. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnical, 11, pp. 63–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-022-00273-z.
Al-Jeznawi, D., Jais M., Bagus I., Albusoda, B.S., and Norazlan, K., 2022. Numerical modeling of single closed and open-ended pipe pile embedded in dry soil layers under coupled static and dynamic loadings. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 31(1), pp. 587-594. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-0055.
Al-Jeznawi, D., Jais M., Bagus, I., Albusoda, B.S., and Norazlan, K., 2022a. The slenderness ratio effect on the response of closed-end pipe piles in liquefied and non-liquefied soil layers under coupled static-seismic loading. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 31(1), pp. 83-89. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0009.
Al-Jeznawi, D., Jais, I.M., and Albusoda, B.S., 2022b. The effect of model scale, acceleration history, and soil condition on closed-ended pipe pile response under coupled static-dynamic loads. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 19(2), pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.6703/IJASE.202206_19(2).007.
Al-Jeznawi, D., Jais, I.M., Al-Janabi, M.A.Q., Alzabeebee, S., Albusoda, B.S., and Keawsawasvong, S., 2024a. Scaling effects on the seismic response of a closed-end pipe pile embedded in dry and saturated coarse grain soils. International Journal of Computational Materials Science and Engineering, 13(2), 2350023. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2047684123500239.
Al-Jeznawi, D., Jais, I.M., and Albusoda, B.S., 2022c. A soil-pile response under coupled static-dynamic loadings in terms of kinematic interaction. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 18(1), pp. 96-103. https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2022-0010.
Al-Jeznawi, D., Jais, I.B.M., and Albusoda, B.S., 2024b. Response of pipe piles embedded in sandy soils under seismic loads. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnical, 11, pp. 1092–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-023-00318-x.
Almashhadany, O.Y., and Albusoda, B.S., 2019. Assessment of soil tunnel interaction in sand soil. In Proceedings of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, (Vol. 584, No. 1, P. 012057). IOP Publishing August 2019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/584/1/012057.
Al-Mosawe, M.J., Al-Saidi, A.A., and Jawad, F.W., 2008. Improvement of soil using geogrids to resist eccentric loads. Journal of Engineering, 14(4), pp. 3198-3208. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2008.04.25.
Al Mosawe, M.J., Al Saidi, A.A., and Jawad, F.W., 2010. Bearing capacity of square footing on geogrid reinforced loose sand to resist eccentric load. Journal of Engineering, 16(2), pp. 4990-4999. . https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2010.02.17.
Al-Mosawe, M.J., Al-Saidi, A.A., and Al-Shakarchi, Y., 2021. Behavior of defective cast in place piles. Journal of Engineering, 27(4), pp. 96-117. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2021.04.08.
Al-Mosawe, M. j., Al-Saidi, A. A., and Jawad, F.W., 2013. Experimental and numerical analysis of piled raft foundation with different length of piles under static loads. Journal of Engineering, 19(5), pp. 543-549. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2013.05.02.
Al-Mosawe, M.J., Al-Saidi, A.A., and Jawad, F.W., 2013. Time domain of piles force and deflection history of piled raft system under axial repeated impact load. Journal of Earth Sciences and Geotechnical Engineering, 3(1), pp. 135-143. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17666.53444.
Anand, V., and Kumar S.R.S., 2018. Seismic soil-structure interaction: A state-of-the-art review. Structures, 16, pp.317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.10.009.
Al-Saidi, A. A., 2016. Correction Factor for Methods of installation of piles group in sandy Iraqi soils. Journal of Engineering, 22(6), pp.172-181. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2016.09.11.
Al-Saidi, A.A., Al-Juari, K.A.K., and Fattah, M.Y., 2022. Reducing settlement of soft clay using different grouting materials. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 31(1), pp. 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0033.
Awchat, G., Monde, A., Sirsikar, R., Dhanjode, G., and Tayade, S., 2022. Soil structure interaction comparative review of international codes and other literature with Indian seismic code. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 18(1), pp. 87-95, . https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2022-0009.
Bachay, H.A., and Al-Saidi A.A. ,2022. The optimum reinforcement layer number for soil under the ring footing subjected to inclined load. Journal of Engineering, 28(12), pp. 18-33. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2022.12.02.
Bachay, H.A., and Al-Saidi A.A., 2024. A review on the performance of shallow footings resting on reinforced sandy soil subjected to inclined loads. In Proceedings of 2024 AIP Conf. Proc. 2864, 030012(2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0186188.
Badrym P., and Satyam, N., 2016. An efficient approach for assessing the seismic soil structure interaction effect for the asymmetrical pile group. Innovation Infrastructure Solution, 1:8. . https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-016-0003-1.
Bazaz, H.B., Akhtarpour A., and Karamodin A., 2021. A study on the effects of piled-raft foundations on the seismic response of a high rise building resting on clayey soil. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 145,106712, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106712.
Bezih, K., Chateauneuf, A., Kalla, M., and Bacconnet, C., 2015. Effect of soil–structure interaction on the reliability of reinforced concrete bridges. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, pp.1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2015.01.007.
Bo, M.W, Na, Y.M., Arulrajah, A., and Chang M.F., 2008. Densification of granular soil by dynamic compaction. Ground Improvement, 162, Issue GI3, pp. 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.2009.162.3.121.
Brule, S., and Duquesnoy, S., 2016. Change of ground type by means of dynamic compaction: consequence on the calculation of seismic loadings. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-016-0037-4.
Çerçevik, A.E., Avşar, Ö., and Hasançebi, O., 2020. Optimum design of seismic isolation systems using metaheuristic search methods. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 131,106012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.106012.
Celebi, E.C., oktepe, F.G., and Karahan N., 2012. Non-linear finite element analysis for prediction of seismic response of buildings considering soil-structure interaction. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,12, pp. 3495–3505 . https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3495-2012.
Choi, Y., and Jung, H.J., 2020. Probabilistic soil-structure interaction analysis of nuclear power plant structure. In Proceedings of Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Virtual Spring Meeting July 9-10, 2020, pp. (1-4). https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-14-8593-0_4990-cd.
Dalili, M.S., Huat, B.B.K., Jaafar, M.S., and Alkarni, A., 2013. Review of static soil-framed structure interaction. Interaction and Multiscale Mechanics, 6(1), pp. 51-81. https://doi.org/10.12989/imm.2013.6.1.051.
Dang, H.K., and Meguid M.A., 2011. An efficient finite–discrete element method for quasi-static nonlinear soil–structure interaction problems. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 37, 2, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1089.
Das, B.M., 2010. Principles of Geotechnical Engineering. 10th ed. Stamford, CT, USA: Cengage Learning,
Desai, C.S., and Zaman, M., 2014. Adavanced Geotechnical Engineering, Soil–Structure Interaction Using Computer and Material Models. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
Dhakar, S., and Jain, S.K., 2016. Stabilization of soil – A review. International Journal of Science and Research, 5 (6), pp. 545–594. http://dx.doi.org/10.21275/v5i6.NOV164184.
El-Hoseiny, K.E., Tayel, M. A., and Abdel Lateef, A.B., 2021. Influence of soil structure interaction on seismic response of multi-storey buildings. Engineering Research Journal, Faculty of Engineering, Menoufia University, 44(1), pp. 33-41. . https://doi.org/10.21608/erjm.2021.35355.1027.
Farfani, H.A., Behnamfar, F., and Fathollahi, A., 2015. Dynamic analysis of soil-structure interaction using the neural networks and the support vector machines. Expert Systems With Applications, 42(22), pp. 8971-8981. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.053.
Fattah, M.Y., Al-Saidi, A.A., and Jaber, M.M., 2015. Characteristics of clays stabilized with lime-silica fume mix. Italian Journal of Geosciences, 134(1), pp. 104–113. https://doi.org/10.3301/IJG.2014.36.
Fattah, M.Y., Al-Saidi, A.A., and Jaber, M.M., 2015. Improvement of bearing capacity of footing on soft clay grouted with lime-silica fume mix. Geomechanics and Engineering, 8(1), pp. 113–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.8.1.000.
Fattah, M.Y., Zbar, B.S., and Mustafa, F.S., 2017. Vertical vibration capacity of a single pile in dry sand. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 35(8), pp. 1111–1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2017.1294219.
Franza, A., Zheng, C., Marshall, A.M., and Jimenez, R., 2021. Investigation of soil–pile–structure interaction induced by vertical loads and tunneling. Computers and Geotechnics, 139,104386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104386.
Freddi, F., Galasso, C., Cremen, G., Dall’Asta, A., Di Sarno, L., Giaralis, A., Gutiérrez-Urzúa, F., Málaga-Chuquitaype, C., Mitoulis, S.A., Petrone, C., Sextos, A., Sousa, L., Tarbali, K., Tubaldi, E., Wardman, J., and Woo, G., 2021. Innovations in
earthquake risk reduction for resilience: Recent advances and challenges. International Journal of Disaster Risk
Reduction: IJDRR, 60(102267), 102267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102267.
Ge, B., Ruan, H., Shu, S., Zhang, F., and Gao, Y., 2022. Effects of seismic amplification on the stability design of geosynthetic reinforced soil walls. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 5(50), pp. 881-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.05.003.
Gouw, T., 2022. Investigation of dynamic compaction and vibro-compaction to mitigate liquefaction: A case study. Indonesian Geotechnical Journal, 1(2), pp. 38-49. https://doi.org/10.56144/igj.v1i2.16.
Grabe, I.J., 2017. 2-Phase dynamic simulation of deep sand compaction to reduce liquefaction. Procedia Engineering 199, pp. 2396–2401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.277.
Hasan, H.N., and Al-Saidi, A.A., 2022. Evaluation of the influence of de-sanding (recycling system) process on the piles bearing capacity using full scale models. Journal of Engineering, 12(28), pp. 80-92. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2022.12.06.
Hasan, H.N., and Al-Saidi, A.A., 2024. Effect of Polymer and Bentonite on the performance of bored pile: A review. In Proceedings of AIP Conf. Proc. Proc. 2864, 030008, January(2024), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0186138.
Hashash, Y.M., and Park D., 2001. Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment. Engineering Geology, Volume 62, Issues 1–3, pp. 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00061-8.
Hussein, R.S., and Albusoda, B.S., 2021. Experimental and numerical analysis of laterally loaded pile subjected to earthquake loading. Modern Applications of Geotechnical Engineering and Construction, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 112, Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9399-4_25.
Kralik, J., 2006. Probability and sensitivity analysis of soil structure interaction of high rise buildings. Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering, 5(3), pp. 18-32. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10189-010-0004-6.
Kunnath, S. K., 2020. Structural engineering and geomechanics. Volume 1, ELOSS publications.
Long, H., Wang, Z., and Peng, C., 2021. Nonlinear study on the structure-soil-structure interaction of seismic response among high-rise buildings. Engineering Structures, 242 112550, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112550.
Loveridge, F., McCartne,y J.S., Narsilio, G.A., and Sanchez, M., 2020. Energy geostructures: A review of analysis approaches, in situ testing and model scale experiments. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment, 22. 100173, pp. 1-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2019.100173.
Matsagar, V.A., and Jangid, R.S., 2008. Base isolation for seismic retrofitting of structures. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:4(175).
Mekki, M., Elachachia, S.M. Breysse,a D., and Zoutatb, M., 2016. Seismic behavior of R.C. structures including soil-structure interaction and soil variability effects. Engineering Structures, 126, pp. 15–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.034.
Mekki, M., Zoutat, M., Elachachi, S.M., and Hemsas, M., 2022. Sensitivity analysis of uncertain material RC structure and soil parameters on seismic response of soil-structure interaction systems. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 66(3), pp. 739–751. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.20113.
Mohammed Ali, J.Y., Al- Saidi, A.A., 2023. Optimum reinforcement depth ratio for sandy soil enhancement to support ring footing subjected to a combination of inclined-eccentric load. Journal of Engineering, 11(29). https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2023.11.06.
Mohammed Ali, J.Y., and Al- Saidi, A.A., 2024. Reinforcement of sandy soil performance to supporting shallow footing under eccentrically-inclined load: A review . In Proceedings of 2024 AIP Conf. Proc. 2864, 030028(2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0186177.
Noman, B.J., and Albusoda, B.S., 2024. Effect of soil-structure interaction on the response of machine foundation subjected to seismic loading: A review study. Journal of Engineering, 30(04), pp. 152-174. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2024.04.10.
Oliveto ND., 2022. Geometrically nonlinear analysis of friction pendulum systems under tri-directional excitation. Engineering Structures, Volume 269,114770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114770.
Park, J.H., Park, J., Park, K.S., and Ok, S.Y., 2007. Analysis of soil-structure interaction considering complicated soil profile. NMA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4310. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70942-8_79.
Priya, D.S., Cinitha, A., Umesha, P.K., and Iyer, N.R., 2014. Enhancing the seismic response of buildings with energy dissipation methods – an overview. Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 4(2A), pp. 17-22. https://doi.org/10.5923/c.jce.201401.04.
Sarsam, S.I , Al- Saidi, A.A., and Al-Khayat, B.H., 2011. Implementation of gypseous soil-asphalt stabilization technique for base course construction. Journal of Engineering, 17 (5), pp. 1066-1076. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2011.05.03.
Sarsam, S.I., Al- Saidi, A.A., and Mukhlef , O.J., 2013. Behavior of reinforced gypseous soil embankment model under cyclic loading. Journal of Engineering, 19(7), pp. 830-844. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2013.07.05.
Sarsam, S.I., Al-Saidi, A.A., and AL Taie, A.H., 2016a. Influence of nano additives on unconfined compressive strength of asphaltic soil. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 1(2): pp. 32-39. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20160102.11.
Sarsam, S.I., Al- Saidi, A.A. and AL Taie, A.H., 2016b. Assessment of shear and compressibility properties of asphalt stabilized collapsible soil. Applied Research Journal, 2(12), pp. 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2021.105354.
Sarsam, S.I. , Al- Saidi, A.A., and Jasim, A.L., 2017a. Monitoring of the compressibility characteristics of asphalt stabilized subgrade. International Journal of Scientific Research in Knowledge, 5(1), pp. 011-019. http://dx.doi.org/10.12983/ijsrk-2017-p0011-0019.
Sarsam, S.I., Al- Saidi, A.A. and AL Taie, A.H., 2017b. Influence of combined stabilization on the structural properties of subgrade soil. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 4 (1), pp. 13-24. https://doi.org/10.37591/joge.v4i1.3735.
Seguini, M., anf Nedjar, D., 2017. Modelling of soil–structure interaction behaviour: Geometric nonlinearity of buried structures combined to spatial variability of soil. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 21(10), 1217–1236. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2016.1153525.
Shahabi, A.B., Ahari, G.Z., and Barghian M.. Base isolation systems – A state of the art review according to their mechanism. Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, 8(2), pp. 37-61. . https://doi.org/10.22075/JRCE.2019.16186.1306.
Sitharam, T.G., Kolathayar, S., Ravi, S., and Matsagar, V., 2022. Theory and Practice in Earthquake Engineering and Technology, Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering, ISBN-10.1007/978-981-19-2324. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2324-1.
Titirla, M.D., 2023. A state-of-the-art review of passive energy dissipation systems in steel braces. Buildings, 13, 851, pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13040851.
Tradigo, F., Pisanò, F.C., Prisco, D.A., and Mussi A., 2015. Non-linear soil–structure interaction in disconnected piled raft foundations. Computers and Geotechnics, 63, pp. 121–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.08.014.
Wang, J., Wang, X., Liu, T., and Ye, A., 2022. Seismic uplift behavior and energy dissipation mechanism of scoured bridge pile-group foundations: Quasi-static test and numerical analysis. Ocean Engineering, 266 ,113172, pp. 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113172.