استخدام عملية التحليل الهرمي الغامض لتقييم العوامل المؤثرة على إدارة تكاليف إعادة تأهيل المباني في العراق

Abdullah, L., Najib, L., 2014. A new type-2 fuzzy set of linguistic variables for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(7), pp. 3297-3305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.11.028

Al-Shiblawi, A. A. O., Erzaij, K. R., 2017. Evaluation of the current situation to application of building information modeling in Iraq. International Journal of Science and Research, 6(3), pp. 1788-1792.

Buckley, J. J., 1985. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), pp. 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9.

Chan, D. W., Kumaraswamy, M. M., 1997. A comparative study of causes of time overruns in Hong Kong construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 15(1), pp. 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00039-7

Cheng, C.-H., Mon, D.-L., 1994. Evaluating weapon system by analytical hierarchy process based on fuzzy scales. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 63(1), pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(94)90140-6

Dağdeviren, M., Yüksel, İ., 2008. Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management. Information Sciences, 178(6), pp. 1717-1733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2007.10.016

Erzaij, K. R., Obaid, A. A., 2017. Application of building information modeling (3D and 4D) in construction sector in Iraq. Journal of Engineering, 23(10), pp. 30-43. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2017.10.03.

Golestani, N., Arzaghi, E., Abbassi, R., and Garaniya, V., 2022. A novel approach to environmental risk mitigation during construction and installation of a wind farm. Proceedings of The Sixth Australasia and South-East Asia Structural Engineering and Construction Conference (ASEA-SEC-6),

https://doi.org/10.14455/ISEC.2022.9%282%29.RAD-06.

Goyal, N., Kharola, S., Kumar, A., Ram, M., Saini, S., and Bedi, P., 2021. Reliability analysis using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP). Intelligent Communication, Control and Devices: Proceedings of ICICCD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1510-8_37.

Gul, M., Guven, B., Guneri, A. F., 2018. A new Fine-Kinney-based risk assessment framework using FAHP-FVIKOR incorporation. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, pp. 53, 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.08.014

Harris, S. Y., 2001. Building pathology: deterioration, diagnostics, and intervention. John Wiley and Sons.

Hasan, S. A. H., Rasheed, S., and Salih, A. H., 2024. Public procurement crisis of Iraq and its impact on construction projects. Journal of Engineering, 30(02), pp. 128-141. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2024.02.09.

He, Q., Ming, Z., Xu, J., and Hu, Y., 2022. Research on the information price measurement of commercial concrete based on FAHP-BP Method. In ICCREM 2022, pp. 759-767. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/9780784484562.083.

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., and Pal, D. K., 2015. Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 7(4), pp. 396-403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975

Jovanović, B., Filipović, J., and Bakić, V., 2015. Prioritization of manufacturing sectors in Serbia for energy management improvement–AHP method. Energy Conversion and Management, 98, pp. 225-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.03.107.

Kadhim, E. M. a. A., Meervat R., 2023. Factors affecting building maintenance practices. Journal of Engineering, 29(12), pp. 153-172. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2023.12.10.

Kamas, W.M., Naji, H.I. and Hasan, A.A., 2017. Evaluation of urban planning projects criteria using fuzzy AHP technique. Journal of Engineering, 23(5), pp.12-26. https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2017.05.02

Kannan, D., Khodaverdi, R., Olfat, L., Jafarian, A., and Diabat, A. 2013. Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, pp. 355-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.010.

Khashei-Siuki, A., Sharifan, H., 2020. Comparison of AHP and FAHP methods in determining suitable areas for drinking water harvesting in Birjand aquifer. Iran. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 10, 100328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100328.

Khorramrouz, F., Pourmahdi Kajabadi, N., Rahiminezhad Galankashi, M., and Mokhatab Rafiei, F. 2019. Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) in failure investigation of knowledge-based business plans. SN Applied Sciences, 1, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1394-3.

Kim, J., Han, S., Hyun, C., 2016. Minimizing fluctuation of the maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation cost profile of a building. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 30(3), pp. 04015034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000775.

Kometa, S. T., Olomolaiye, P. O., and Harris, F. C., 1994. Attributes of UK construction clients influencing project consultants' performance. Construction Management and Economics, 12(5), pp. 433-443. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446199400000053.

Koroteev, D., Huang, J., and Kamrunnaher, M., 2020. Construction cost control and duration analysis of rehabilitation project. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1687/1/012012.

Kumar, R., Suman, S. K., 2022. Prioritization of flexible pavement sections for maintenance using multi-criteria FAHP integrated with multi-attribute utility theory. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 6(3), pp. 633-656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-022-00235-5.

Liu, Y., Eckert, C. M., and Earl, C., 2020. A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Systems with Applications, 161, 113738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738.

Lyu, H.-M., Sun, W.-J., Shen, S.-L., and Zhou, A.-N., 2020. Risk assessment using a new consulting process in fuzzy AHP. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(3), p. 04019112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001757.

Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., and Zavadskas, E. K., 2015. Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications–Two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(8), pp. 4126-4148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003.

Mistarihi, M. Z., and Magableh, G. M., 2023. Prioritization of supply chain capabilities using the FAHP technique. Sustainability, 15(7), p. 6308. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076308.

Ren, J.J., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y.C., Wei, K., Zhang, K.Y., Ye, W.l., and Zhang, Y., 2023. Evaluation of slab track quality indices based on entropy weight-fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Engineering Failure Analysis, 149, 107244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107244.

Saaty, T. L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(11), pp. 1073-1076.

Shaygan, A., Testik, Ö. M., 2019. A fuzzy AHP-based methodology for project prioritization and selection. Soft Computing, 23, pp. 1309-1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2851-9.

Van Laarhoven, P. J., Pedrycz, W., 1983. A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(1-3), pp. 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7.

Vigneault, M.-A., Boton, C., Chong, H.-Y., and Cooper-Cooke, B. (2020). An innovative framework of 5D BIM solutions for construction cost management: a systematic review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 27, pp. 1013-1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09341-z.

Vinogradova-Zinkevič, I., 2023. Comparative sensitivity analysis of some fuzzy AHP methods. Mathematics, 11(24), 4984. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11244984.

Zadeh, L. A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), pp. 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.

Zhang, X., Xing, X., Xie, Y., Zhang, Y., Xing, Z., and Luo, X., 2019. Airport operation situation risk assessment: combination method based on FAHP and fine Kinney. Sixth International Conference on Transportation Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482742.049.