Analysis of Traditional and Fuzzy Quality Control Charts to Improve Short-Run Production in the Manufacturing Industry

Main Article Content

Reyam Raheem Jabbar
Ahmed Abdulrasool Ahmed Alkhafaji

Abstract

Quality control charts are limited to controlling one characteristic of a production process, and it needs a large amount of data to determine control limits to control the process. Another limitation of the traditional control chart is that it doesn’t deal with the vague data environment. The fuzzy control charts work with the uncertainty that exists in the data. Also, the fuzzy control charts investigate the random variations found between the samples. In modern industries, productivity is often of different designs and a small volume that depends on the market need for demand (short-run production) implemented in the same type of machines to the production units. In such cases, it is difficult to determine the control limits for the operations carried out on the same machines. This work aims to compare the traditional control charts and the fuzzy control charts for short-run production. In the traditional case, the data collected were processed using the (Minitab 21) software. It was found that the fuzzy control charts were more flexible and accurate in determining the control limits of the machine under study. The traditional deviation from nominal control charts showed false alarm of observation (15) as out-of-control, while the fuzzy (DNOM) showed that these observations were under control. Also, the standard deviation of the process was dropped from (σ =0.209041) to (σ =0.204401) after using the fuzzy control chart.

Article Details

How to Cite
“Analysis of Traditional and Fuzzy Quality Control Charts to Improve Short-Run Production in the Manufacturing Industry” (2023) Journal of Engineering, 29(06), pp. 159–176. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2023.06.12.
Section
Articles

How to Cite

“Analysis of Traditional and Fuzzy Quality Control Charts to Improve Short-Run Production in the Manufacturing Industry” (2023) Journal of Engineering, 29(06), pp. 159–176. doi:10.31026/j.eng.2023.06.12.

Publication Dates

References

Akeem, A. A., 2018. Performance of fuzzy control chart over the traditional control chart. Benin Journal of Statistics, 1, pp. 101-112.

Al-Khafaji, A.A., AL-Mendwi, K.A., and Al – Saady, D.M.H., 2012. Adjusting off – centering process for a blow molded plastic product by use of WINQSB software. Journal of Engineering, 18(4), pp. 518-532.

Al obeidy N. Q., and Alkhafaji A. A., 2018. Improving the statistical process control chart by applying a DNOM chart for multiprocessor products. 2nd International Conference on Engineering Sciences. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/433/1/012068.

Alwan N.Q., 2018. Study and modify of statistical process control chart for short production runs (SPCCSPR), MSc. Thesis, University of Baghdad, College of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering.

Alwan, N.Q., and Ahmed, A.A., 2018. Comparison between (X ̅ – R) Charts in traditional and deviation nominal methods with usage process capability analysis. Association of Arab Universities Journal of Engineering Sciences, 25(5), pp. 415-428.

De Meiraa, M.R.M., Oprimea, P.C., and Mergulhãob, R.C., 2022. Analysis of deviation from nominal control chart performance on short production runs, Production, 32, P. 20210092. doi: 10.1590/0103-6513.20210092.

Dilipkumar, R., and Nanthakumar, C., 2019. Construction of fuzzy mean using standard deviation X ̅ - S control chart with process capability, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(4), pp. 5390-5396. doi: 10.3233/IFS-151551.

Enad, F.H., and Jaber, A.G., 2020. Using kernel density estimator to determine the limits of multivariate control charts. Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 26(124), pp. 443-459.

Fonseca, D. J., Elam, M. E. and Tibbs, L., 2007. Fuzzy short-run control charts. Mathware & Soft Computing 14, pp. 81-101.

Hamada, A.A., Melik, H.N. and Raheem, S.H., 2020. The use of fuzzy logic theory in control charts (a comparative study). International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(7), pp. 389-402. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28799.02720.

Hassan, I., and Saeed, N. H., 2012. Solving fuzzy-parametric linear programming problems, Ibn Al Haitham Journal for Pure and Applied Science, 26(1), pp. 303-311.

Mitlif, R. J., 2023. Fuzzy transportation model technique to determine the minimum total cost using a novel ranking function, Ibn Al Haitham Journal for Pure and Applied Science, 36(1), pp.318-324. doi: 10.30526/36.1.2991.

Mohammed, Z. M., 2022. Modelling time-series process of an agricultural crop production process by EWMA quality control chart, International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, 23(1), pp.76-95. doi: 10.1504/IJMOR.2022.126046

Montgomery, D., 2013. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, seventh edition. Arizona State University.

Qori'atunnadyah, M., Wibawati, Udiatami, W.M., Ahsan, M., and Khusna, H., 2021. Comparison of short runs control chart and T2 hotelling control chart for monitoring sunergy glass production process, Journal of Physics, 2106 (2021). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2106/1/012019.

Razali, H., Abdullah, L., Ab-Ghani, T., and Aimran, N., 2020. Application of fuzzy control charts: a review of its analysis and findings, Springer Nature Singapore, pp. 483-490. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-8297-0_50.

Rodríguez-Alvarez, J.L., Lopez-Herrera, R.E., Villalon-Turrubiates, I.E., Molina-Arredondob, R.D., García-Alcaraz, J.L., and Hernandez-Olvera, O.D., 2021. Analysis and control of the paper moisture content variability by using fuzzy and traditional individual control charts, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 208, P. 104211. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.104211.

Senturk, S., and Erginel, N., 2009. Development of fuzzy X ̅ -R and X ̅ -S control charts using α-cuts, Information Sciences, 179, pp. 1542-1551. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2008.09.022.

Thamer, E. D., and Hussein, I. H., 2021. Solving fuzzy attribute quality control charts with proposed ranking function. Ibn Al Haitham Journal for Pure and Applied Science, 34(2), pp. 33-41. doi: 10.30526/34.2.2611.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.